hashtagmarkup

5 ms·

1.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
After 5 replies, there isn't much room for logic. Trolls gonna troll... you should consider that. I can help. Fly out, I got a guest room. I guarantee you won't regret it.
2.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
I wouldn't want to be a part of anything that denied the truth in favor of civility. Dang, I thought you would have understood that.
3.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
What do you call it when someone pees into someone else's pee sample?
4.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
Heavy handed moderators are obviously to blame.
5.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
Still ignorant and wrong tho...
6.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
You're absolutely right... the other person was ignorant and wrong.
7.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
I'm not the person who said outting people as gay was productive. The other person claimed it could be destructive.
8.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
Because the DKIM keys were not made public, and a message sent from their account could be confirmed to be authentic. If the keys were public, they could claim forgery. Regardless they could claim their account was hacked, but they couldn&
9.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
It doesn't at all. You're misunderstanding. Or, are you using the word "literally" in the modern sense of "not literally"?
10.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
By making the DKIM keys public, you are converting solid evidence of something that was said into something that was either really said, or someone else pretended that they said. Evidence was destroyed.
11.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
As a hand-waving technical pedantic, you are literally correct. But, "literally" actually has a specific meaning in english, and it's not always to be literal .
12.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
> Being gay is not a crime, and yet people can be blackmailed with it. It is very easy to open yourself up to blackmail by perfectly legitimate activities. Option 1: DKIM keys stay private... "That email was just a joke, I'm n
13.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
You're misunderstanding how destruction of evidence works.
14.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
Yes. We are saying the same thing.
15.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
> The threat is not limited to politicians. Anyone (including you and your family members) could be blackmailed or otherwise publicly embarrassed. ... for what they actually did. You think the solution is allowing people to be blackmail
16.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
Except your "backyard shed" is actually an uncountable number of your cells that are "edited" (changed using the reprogramming abilities inherent to mRNA, but god forbid you refer to it as such) into not being "bac
17.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
This isn't about funding... this is about taking a giant leap into mRNA vaccines, that until now have not been approved for human use. We aren't injecting processed proteins into our bloodstream to trigger and train our immune s
18.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
They screwed up by putting themselves in this position where their only hope for a future is desperately trying to distance themselves from what they've done and who they are.
19.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
Do you know what "reflection" means? You're not making any sense.
20.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
This doesn't really have anything to do with Google and Facebook. Did you read the article?
21.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
It struck me too... but as completely wrong. A large majority of my work is in APIs, both as a consumer and provider; between local processes, local networks, and the global internet. Every program I build talks to other programs... a lot
22.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
In addition to that being a fact, synthetic mRNA can predominantly reprogram cells to create arbitrary proteins, which provides additional stability and protects the programmer.
23.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
Oh... so you only thought of 1 fungus, and then concluded that there couldn't be any drug at all... by and large. I guess you never learned 1 =/= ∞. Your off switch is probably stuck.
24.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
It's never been approved for human testing *until now under the administration of a lame duck lunatic begging for a reason to take credit for a solution. How did those cancer treatments pan out? Why weren't they FDA approved?
25.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
One conclusion I got in a mathematical logic exam so many many moons ago was how something being "not as X" still implied that something was "somewhat X".... so just because "RNA is not as suitable as DNA for storin
26.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
Maybe you could have started your thinking with the #1 abused drug in the world, heroin; and the nearly instant off switch drug, narcan, that is carried by everyone in emergency medical services. How much is pfizer paying you? or are you j
27.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
I don't know why you don't see the difference between similar symptoms and similar mechanisms. A compromised immune system spiraling out of control attacking itself looks the same from the outside. I do know where you're not
28.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
Yeah... and that's why cowpox was bad. If your immune system realizes the source of the spike proteins is your own reprogrammed cells, and then attacks them, it will lead to cascade autoimmune disorders mimicking the symptoms of AIDS.
29.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
This isn't like the first person biting into a new apple variety for the first time... this is like the first person growing an apple from scratch in their stomach, using techniques that have never before been approved for human use. I
30.
by hashtagmarkup 6y ago
They have never been approved for human use, so you might want to check sources on that data.

More ›