happybeing

5 ms·

1.
by happybeing 3y ago
I agree that's a possibility, but I'd rather the chance some of those accounts get linked than give my data to Google. The reason I did that wasn't privacy in the first place, so any privacy benefits are a bonus. I did it so
2.
by happybeing 3y ago
I have both my own non-identifiable domain which I use for email - and a domain of my own name which I picked up when the original owner let it expire. I had to bid to get it from a broker who squatted it but it didn't cost much. My na
3.
by happybeing 3y ago
p2p does not necessarily imply the limitation you describe. I don't know how Quiet uses IPFS but a truly decentralised storage system such as the design of Safe Network can hold data locally (eg using CRDTs) and/or in a decentrali
4.
by happybeing 6y ago
I get this is a popular view, and justifiably so. The project is not a get rich scheme for the founder, you will see that if you look at how it was created and the structures that support it (which include a Scottish Charity that owns the c
5.
by happybeing 6y ago
https://SafeNetwork.tech is thoroughly p2p and doesn't reveal IP addresses because it's designed from the ground up to be decentralised, anonymous and censorship resistant.
6.
by happybeing 6y ago
Yes folks, take a look at git-bug, Michael has done a brilliant job of adding issues and comments into your git repos, and for a pre v1 project it works really well already, and you can import from / to github, gitlab and JIRA. git-bu
7.
by happybeing 6y ago
After thinking about this for a couple of years while helping the Safe Network (a decentralisation project worth getting to know) I began my own effort to decentralise github based on Safe, just last Sunday! Even before Friday's censor
8.
by happybeing 6y ago
Mateo, I'm very interested in primo and look forward to putting it to work once it is open source. So very pleased that you are heading that way! I'd like to sign up to the forum without using github (as I'm allergic to anyth
9.
by happybeing 6y ago
1. This is a fair point right now but it is only temporary. There's a SAFE Network App which will be the key to the network, providing a single point of contact, installing other things, seeing up a vault if you want to farm, create a
10.
by happybeing 6y ago
Maidsafe don't market aggressively, it's not their way so I think you are mistaken. They did attend a could of bitcoin type conferences in person in the early days but I very much doubt they paid anyone to promote their coin. IMO
11.
by happybeing 6y ago
> I don't understand what problem this is solving, or how it can work. A couple of forum topics will give good answers to this. TLDR: Secure incendiaries, perpetual data storage without surveillance or censorship. This post enumerat
12.
by happybeing 6y ago
There will be pros and cons in access speed. I expect some latency compared to a CDN that is caching close to the client, but not necessarily significant. And some things may even be faster because chunks are served from random locations me
13.
by happybeing 12y ago
That description sounds like http://MaidSafe.net , which is rapidly approaching launch.
14.
by happybeing 12y ago
Anyone interested in porting the Ubuntu One code onto a new free, open source decentralized cloud network? The spec is amazing, including client side encryption, fully anonymous, no single point of failure, no way for the network to be cens