hamhock666

7 ms·

1.
by hamhock666 1mo ago
Isn’t this GPS data to see where Covid has spread? Even if your name is anonymous, a GPS point that every day goes to your work and then your home is surely you?
2.
by hamhock666 2mo ago
Well you remember how Captain Kirk had his computer speak to him in a special female voice, and he was "married" to the ship ;)
3.
by hamhock666 3mo ago
There are usually ways to fix the problems in your life, like sadness and hunger, without resorting to using drugs. Maybe not everyone but it is something we should strive for.
4.
by hamhock666 3mo ago
If you can find a way to use your own free will and self-discipline to stop the bad condition then that seems preferable to using a drug. Maybe someone doesn't have the willpower in which case it's good that we have the drug. With
5.
by hamhock666 10mo ago
I don't know much about these cases but is anyone from that country coming forward to media and saying their spouse was killed on the ship? Is there anyone who is claiming it was a mistake from that country?
6.
by hamhock666 10mo ago
Aren't they waters near our coast? Do we not kill pirates on the other side of the world?
7.
by hamhock666 11mo ago
I don't think the voters asked for either of those things. It is unfortunate
8.
by hamhock666 11mo ago
Why would they do that? Is this just spam?
9.
by hamhock666 1y ago
> Slavery was only ended by violence I don't think this is quite true, it may have ended it faster, but I don't think it would still exist today if the civil war had not happened. Most other countries ended slavery without a vi
10.
by hamhock666 1y ago
Kind of ironic there is no download button!
11.
by hamhock666 1y ago
Don't people already pay for things like the NYT? I guess local papers might be harder, they may have to demonstrate they can reveal the journalistic failures of other papers in local affairs.
12.
by hamhock666 1y ago
> ... I can't imagine a world where Congress could actually achieve something that widely helpful for regular citizens. The solution is to not use the internet if you care about your privacy.
13.
by hamhock666 2y ago
Kind of ironic given what you are posting about. I think I need to get off the internet
14.
by hamhock666 2y ago
Yes you just need to reorganize those smart people into a new system. I don’t agree with everything being done.
15.
by hamhock666 2y ago
We are trusting Donald Trumps judgement to execute on the promises he made to get elected. Nothing is perfect, and I think this whole thing is probably happening too early.
16.
by hamhock666 2y ago
It has to be done quickly because the administrative state is large and there is a lot to do. Institutions grow old with time and need drastic reform or replacement. I don’t know what they will replace everything with, ideally they have a b
17.
by hamhock666 2y ago
This is a give and take, both branches the congress and the executive are equal, and both are democratically elected. Some situations call for more of one. Since WW2 we have had a growing unelected federal bureaucracy (staffed by college gr
18.
by hamhock666 2y ago
I would say serves my interests, and not just my interests but all of those who voted a certain way. That’s what elections should be
19.
by hamhock666 2y ago
I know AI means a lot of “content” on the internet will become trash, but how specifically do you think AI will be used to control people, aside from deepfakes? I think the internet was great initially for countering this 1984ness, but ever
20.
by hamhock666 2y ago
But why take the chance? Just buy a metal spatula next time and there’s nothing to worry about if it turns out to be true
21.
by hamhock666 2y ago
You never know, he could be visited by an alien that gives him the power of immortality, we don’t know what’s out there
22.
by hamhock666 2y ago
Well why, what makes you call this science denialism? What is wrong with the article?
23.
by hamhock666 2y ago
Yes if the people are not there to hold leaders accountable in a democracy, bad things like this will continue to happen
24.
by hamhock666 2y ago
Because it gives them more power, and nobody cares to organize or do anything about it in terms of voting out said politicians.
25.
by hamhock666 3y ago
I guess money for the point of money is the issue. If you have some higher goal like doing something in the world or running a business, then more money probably helps with that.
26.
by hamhock666 3y ago
I think you’re right that people have been banned from things as long as the internet has been around. However more tools exist today to censor, things like AI generating and reading subtitles for YT demonetization and algorithm deranking.
27.
by hamhock666 3y ago
I think to most people on the internet in the early 2000s, it was unthinkable that content on the major platforms would be censored based on political content. I don’t think there is any evidence for that, it’s more of a general feeling, an
28.
Project64 1.6 Vulnerability(youtube.com)
2 points by hamhock666 3y ago|0 comments
29.
by hamhock666 3y ago
It seems like he was stating a fact, that it is entertainment for many who watch. Most people are not going to take this information and do anything useful with it. Regarding the psychopath comment, it seems like many more Ukrainians (and R
30.
by hamhock666 3y ago
Don't you want to know what the public position of a country is that we are so involved with? In what way is any politician not a liar in some respect? If you care about future geopolitical events then it's useful to know public p

More ›