haltIncomplete

5 ms·

1.
by haltIncomplete 2y ago
Yep, see, exactly; given direct experience of the opposite in both contexts, I reject the premise without saying “yes” and am downvoted. It’s a laughable generalization that doesn’t hold up in reality. So easy to write words, but so hard to
2.
by haltIncomplete 2y ago
All we’re doing is engineering new data compression and retrieval techniques: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10668 Are we sure there’s anything “net new” to find within the same old x86 machines, within the same old axioma
3.
by haltIncomplete 2y ago
Why are static 3D cells going to get us there when other ideas have not? Is it needed to replicate “arbitrary” academic ideas of consciousness (despite our best efforts our models are always approximation) to make a useful machine? “Living
4.
by haltIncomplete 2y ago
They learned it from somewhere.
5.
by haltIncomplete 2y ago
There’s no real point, not in a physical science way It’s all contrived political points; contracts, socialized norms the elders in charge refuse to negotiate. The stubbornness and selfishness of the gerontocracy, to serve the dying and dea
6.
by haltIncomplete 2y ago
If you have a suggestion for avoiding that, go for it. Tribalism seems endemic to humanity though given physical reality sees us dispersed across the globe. Every attempt at a singular hivemind of social and economic thought has failed as g
7.
by haltIncomplete 2y ago
People can own things != minority of people should own all the things. Gradients, ranges, distributions, not binary. If it’s so banal it would have no influence but you seem to accept the underlying; “banal” facts have power and social conc
8.
by haltIncomplete 2y ago
Owns is a socialized concept. It’s not immutable physics We learn what it means as far as ground truth from socialization
9.
by haltIncomplete 2y ago
For YC/HN to peddle fewer platitudes, euphemisms, and equivocations. At what point does preservation of this hallucinated wealth game become forced conservation of history and get in the way of the “freedom” part? Why are we socially t
10.
by haltIncomplete 2y ago
It was obvious to Turing and Church because of Gödel; incompleteness theorem restated. Einstein, Gödel, and a few others verified work means the majority of us are coloring within the lines they drew until we die.