halfadot

7 ms·

1.
by halfadot 1y ago
> The article sort of goes sideways with this idea but pointing out that AI coding robs you a deep understanding of the code it produces is a valid and important criticism of AI coding. No it isn't. There's literally nothing ab
2.
by halfadot 1y ago
>In that context, the answer in this case is to simply start talking about your project and showing it to people and asking for feedback (as you have done), and be conscious that what you're looking for is signals of user interest -
3.
by halfadot 1y ago
>The hypothetical is irrelevant here; what is germane is that the expectation of privacy by the individual participants, and the terms which bind people who use that service. How can you have an expectation of privacy in a public forum?
4.
by halfadot 1y ago
You produced a passive-aggressive taunt instead of addressing the argument. For clarity: nobody was asking about your business decisions, nobody is intimidated by your story. what your personal opinions about "attitude" are is ir
5.
by halfadot 1y ago
For almost everyone in the world, the answer is the latter.
6.
by halfadot 1y ago
> Leaning on an LLM to ease through those tough moments is 100% short circuiting the learning process. Sounds like "back in my days" type of complaining. Do you have any evidence of this "100% reduction" or is it just
7.
by halfadot 1y ago
> Don’t let a computer write for you! I say this not for reasons of intellectual honesty, or for the spirit of fairness. I say this because I believe that your original thoughts are far more interesting, meaningful, and valuable than wh
8.
by halfadot 2y ago
Luckily for Mistral, capital also exists in countries other than the USA.
9.
by halfadot 2y ago
> Three months later in April when this tagged data is used to train the next iteration, the AI can successfully learn that today's date is actually January 29th. Such an ingenious attack, surely none of these companies ever conside
10.
by halfadot 2y ago
Yeah, it's great comedy. > Aaron clearly warns users that Nepenthes is aggressive malware. It's not to be deployed by site owners uncomfortable with trapping AI crawlers and sending them down an "infinite maze" of sta
11.
by halfadot 2y ago
And they are hilarious, because they ride on the assumption that multi-billion dollar companies are all just employing naive imbeciles who just push buttons and watch the lights on the server racks go, never checking the datasets.
12.
by halfadot 2y ago
AI models don't assume anything. AI models are just statistical tools. Their data is prepared by humans, who aren't morons. What is it with these super-ignorant AI critiques popping up everywhere?
13.
by halfadot 2y ago
What makes people think companies like OpenAI can't just pay experts for verified true data? Why do all these "gotcha" replies always revolve around the idea that everyone developing AI models is credulous and stupid?
14.
by halfadot 2y ago
It is absolutely fascinating to read the fantasy produced by people who (apparently) think they live in a sci-fi movie. The companies whose datasets you're "poisoning" absolutely know about the attempts to poison data. All t