halayli

5 ms·

1.
by halayli 2mo ago
Not picking on you but your answer prove the parent comment's point. Your answer is that of someone that googled some answer and went with it. This problem belongs to selection algorithms and quickselect is the common approach.
2.
by halayli 2mo ago
> Right out the gate: the numbers must be sorted. if you are not aware of quickselect algorithm.
3.
by halayli 4mo ago
> Never underestimate developing countries' governments' willingness to absolutely bend their people over to extract tax revenue (and then their corrupt representatives extract bribes on top of it) being a developing country or
4.
by halayli 4mo ago
Nothing you said here is correct. Paths, query strings, and fragments are all well defined entities. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#section-3.3
5.
by halayli 6mo ago
To be honest, what you did here is called speculation. Claims require evidence, and you provided none. Your confident tone is unjustified imo.
6.
by halayli 6mo ago
This is false equivalence. You're describing the luxury market, a vertical that is built on decoupling the raw material cost from the price tag. And in reality it is more nuanced than just raw material as there is a lot of cost in r&am
7.
by halayli 6mo ago
Reading your parent comment and the responses, I feel be missing the point others are trying to make. There's much less technology, components, and material in a headphone compared to laptops. The circuitry in the headphones is closer
8.
by halayli 6mo ago
This is a very reasonable comment. IMO it's a falacy to take into consideration the age of an account especially when it is subjective experience.
9.
by halayli 6mo ago
That doesn't sound accurate. The T in TPM stands for trust, the whole standard is about verifying and establishing trust between entities. The standard is designed with the assumption that anyone can bring in their scope and probe the
10.
by halayli 6mo ago
I will start sharing them moving forward. I've had several parent threads deleted in the past(rightfully so) because it turned out I was responding to AI. Thank you for staying on top of this.
11.
by halayli 6mo ago
This is not a special case. Everything you mentioned above can actually be achieved using cli. You can create listeners, configure pipelines, and sinks(granted not ergonomic). Sinks can be HTTP post for example, and sources can be tcp liste
12.
by halayli 6mo ago
I feel HN comments have been getting hijacked for a long time now by LLM agents. Always so early, very positive, and hard to spot. Some replaced em-dash with --, some replace them with a single dash, some remove them all together. I wonder
13.
by halayli 6mo ago
Totally. I always found joy solving critical performance problems because it naturally pave a path forward to peel the layers and untangle the system interactions which feeds my curiosity, and is highly rewarding.
14.
by halayli 6mo ago
agreed. Strong emphasis on "profiling and identifying the actual bottleneck". Every benchmark will show a nested stack of performance offenders, but a solid interpretation requires a much deeper understanding of systems in general
15.
by halayli 6mo ago
Yes definitely not dismissing the lock overhead, but I wanted to bring attention to the implicit false equivalence made in the post. That said, I am surprised the lock check was showing up and not the logging/formatting functions.
16.
by halayli 6mo ago
a real human. threads can exist before main() starts. for example, you can include another tu which happens to launch a thread and call instance(). Singletons used to be a headache before C++11 and it was common(maybe still is) to see macro
17.
by halayli 6mo ago
The performance observation is real but the two approaches are not equivalent, and the article doesn't mention what you're actually trading away, which is the part that matters. The C++11 threadsafety guarantee on static initializ
18.
by halayli 7mo ago
no offense but it looks like the reason behind oauth confusion is the author. I had to read half way through to get to a definition which was a poor explanation. Sometimes certain topics are difficult to understand because the initial perso
19.
by halayli 7mo ago
What about using claude -p as an api interface?
20.
by halayli 7mo ago
This is the definition of reasoning motivated fallacy. You want to believe what you want to believe.
21.
by halayli 7mo ago
My naive take is we discovered it as a math tool first but later on rediscovered it in nature when we discovered the electromagnetic field. The electromagnetic field is naturally a single complex valued object(Riemann/Silberstein F = E
22.
by halayli 7mo ago
Maybe I missed it but I don't see them defining what they mean by ethics. Ethics/morals are subjective and changes dynamically over time. Companies have no business trying to define what is ethical and what isn't due to confl
23.
by halayli 7mo ago
I am not sure the author knows what spacial frequency means. Taking a well defined measurement unit and using it as an expression feels pretencious.
24.
by halayli 9mo ago
I think parent comment was pointing to lack of establishing a causation link. The finding in their abstract is extrapolated by statistical inference. For example smokers tend to drink more etc. The paper does take such factors into account.
25.
by halayli 9mo ago
wasn't aware of ffcall, it's definitely a better fit
26.
by halayli 9mo ago
I feel libffi is better suited and supports most platforms.
27.
by halayli 9mo ago
your question leaks your intentions and drives the LLM to confirm your cognitive bias. it treats your intentions as conclusion. Try to form your questions in a way that allow LLM to arrive to the word/concept of "suppression"
28.
by halayli 10mo ago
on a similar note, there are also these field attributes that are very helpful for catching similar issues: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#counted-...
29.
by halayli 10mo ago
This is not a good idea. You're venturing in the unspecified/non-portable behavior territory. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xsh/brk.html > The behaviour of brk() and sbrk() is uns
30.
by halayli 10mo ago
That's not true based on zod docs. https://zod.dev/api?id=objects most of the claims you're making against zod is inaccurate. the readme feels like false claims by ai.

More ›