Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
halation_effect
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
How many parameters could a $100B datacenter train? [pdf]
(conferences.sigcomm.org)
2 points
by
halation_effect
1y ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
I've Got 99 Problems but Flops Ain't One [pdf]
(conferences.sigcomm.org)
2 points
by
halation_effect
2y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
halation_effect
5y ago
You can use 9pfs or build upon the block device.
4.
▲
by
halation_effect
5y ago
Reference paper[1]. [1] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3447786.3456248
5.
▲
by
halation_effect
5y ago
Systems research is more relevant than ever. You should take a look over the papers published at conferences such as SOSP, OSDI, EuroSys and HotOS. You'll see quite a lot of papers from industry giants. Lots of research OSs are also ga
6.
▲
by
halation_effect
5y ago
I recommend Unikraft[1][2][3] as an alternative. It is under active development. [1] https://unikraft.org/ [2] https://github.com/unikra ft/unikraft [3] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1
7.
▲
by
halation_effect
5y ago
From the paper: "MirageOS [40] is an OCaml-specific unikernel focusing on type-safety, so does not support mainstream applications, and its performance, as shown in our evaluation, is sub-par with respect to other unikernel projects&qu
8.
▲
by
halation_effect
5y ago
You could try fuzzing. But, if you do not include a modular OS feature(e.g network stack), the unikernel would not compile since it's missing symbols.
9.
▲
by
halation_effect
5y ago
I think it should be able to provide the same guarantees as a RTOS if you implement them. But then, would you call it a unikernel still or a RTOS?
10.
▲
by
halation_effect
5y ago
Couldn't you make a real time unikernel? Basically you should be able to modify an existing unikernel implementation to make it real time.
11.
▲
by
halation_effect
5y ago
Best paper award at EuroSys21. [1] https://twitter.com/EuroSys_conf/status/1386979936074969093?...