hakre

5 ms·

1.
by hakre 1y ago
what you describe reminds me pretty much of a binary blob that is loaded into a machine or software. additionally modifying data in binary form was a longtime practice last time I looked, but I might not remember correctly.
2.
by hakre 2y ago
Free Software is not the same as expropriation. It's perhaps more the social-democratic smoke mirror kind of thing than lifting the dependency. Regardless of free software, capitalists control the means of production and obtain profits
3.
by hakre 2y ago
A better way to differentiate might be to say how many watts have been used for an answer. > Humans reason Are you sure? They reason in a way to match others predictions, right? The problem of humans transporting information from one ind
4.
by hakre 2y ago
Messaging is very simple, but made hard so that the benefit is not on your side. Business opportunities, yay!
5.
by hakre 3y ago
Isn't using GPU and hardware acceleration considered experimental in browsers and the safe default to disable such features for day-to-day use? Not saying to make this achievement smaller than it is, quite the opposite, it's impor
6.
by hakre 3y ago
> We are the collective voice of the game development industry—developers, game designers, artists, and business minds. Passionate about our craft, we've invested years in shaping an industry that touches the lives of millions world
7.
by hakre 3y ago
While I'm able to understand your argument, IMHO the MIT license is not displaying that well. Community is plural, and fork with MIT could be like Windows: Closed source. End of the (fork) line. Given the project itself is still strong
8.
by hakre 3y ago
see exec builtin in the bash shell. otherwise man execvp etc.
9.
by hakre 3y ago
Everything was reverted with 48 hours, your arguments might all apply theoretically but given scope, size, practice and handling, I wonder - apart from the theory - what your opinion is how they practically apply for this case.
10.
by hakre 3y ago
Isn't community plural? Perhaps they meant their own community but didn't say specifically which one?
11.
by hakre 3y ago
Are you commenting about April of 2021 and do you mean the University of Minnesota? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26887670 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26949539 - https://news.
12.
by hakre 3y ago
The only question that remains then perhaps is, whether this statement was from the inside or the outside.
13.
by hakre 3y ago
No wonder, the tab bar is open only. Managing multiple tabs is a no-go with it, or lets say, a wonderful journey into Firefox UI.
14.
by hakre 3y ago
Thanks, that better helped me to understand your comment. Additionally I was not aware if that was with pull-requests or more with regular code-reviews as part of the development process. That was an additional insight, thanks for sharing.
15.
by hakre 3y ago
Your relatively short comment caught my interest and I'd like to learn more about your thoughts. As, IMHO it depends (as so often). Code review is commonly the place that puts the current style under test (hence automated otherwise you
16.
by hakre 3y ago
- It does not ask for consent - It does not allow a reasonable decision as it does not show the data before it sends it
17.
by hakre 3y ago
Yeah, why not? But often GNU Make is fine for incremental builds.
18.
by hakre 3y ago
local like in tree.
19.
by hakre 3y ago
But they are clever, you can have the runner local. (They start to ruin that, but lets say, the idea is still visible.)
20.
by hakre 3y ago
IMHO this is also a good remark in context of those container images that most of all have /bin/sh. Technically not all, but many distro based containers. so if someone plans to extend the script so that it injects it iself into t
21.
by hakre 3y ago
Those of the workforce, that is a pretty typical situation. Timestamps of activity etc. .
22.
by hakre 3y ago
oh snap, too late to edit ... you are absolutely right.
23.
by hakre 3y ago
This is a great baseline, but it is often easier said than done. For example, those repositories contain a lot of privately identifiable information, it is not that easy to get such a baseline ready for that _"should be treated as if t
24.
by hakre 3y ago
A cooperation is never reputable. It is easier to reason with a dog than with a cooperation. However, me thinks this relates to the times before Github became an offering by Microsoft. But the deal was just too hard to miss, getting this ma
25.
by hakre 3y ago
What for? I've seen this happening and if there would not have been a review, it would have stayed there unnoticed. /edit: Also what someone considers a secret and then not, is often not well defined. If management has no clue wha
26.
by hakre 3y ago
it depends on the invocation, and by default it checks for tty or not. the aliasing often does not touch this. example alias: $ alias ls ls='ls --color=tty' and from ls(1): "With --color=auto, ls emits color codes o
27.
by hakre 3y ago
Personally I didn't wanted to invite to more guesses, however if this was because of any of those reasons, it does not look to me there was anyone in a hurry: txti @txties 15. Juni 2020: "I realize txti is broken at the moment, an
28.
by hakre 3y ago
In concrete not, for the past: txti @txties 28. März 2020: "Txti is currently down because some folks can’t follow rules and have created phishing or other malicious pages." < https://twitter.com/txties/stat
29.
by hakre 3y ago
IMHO much speculation for the little explanation provided. Do you have more information? Was it offered to the community to take over for those who may want or similar?
30.
by hakre 3y ago
Following this since some days, still think its not a classic injection, it's just prompting. You either open the "prompting" interface or you don't. If it's by design, then so be it. You can't prevent SQL inje

More ›