hahainternet

5 ms·

1.
by hahainternet 8y ago
No you completely lied and are now trying to save face.
2.
by hahainternet 8y ago
https://github.com/damonkohler/sl4a has been around in one form or another for a decade or so. It looks dead in that repository though.
3.
by hahainternet 8y ago
Yours is the only post in this entire thread adding the needed context. The article doesn't either. Yet somehow you were at the bottom of the page for me. I don't understand why.
4.
by hahainternet 8y ago
Is it appropriate for you to be trying to attack the guy's credibility? Seems odd that it would be the first and only response given this video.
5.
by hahainternet 8y ago
It's clear you're not looking at this from a neutral perspective. Given that the situation is significantly different than you imagined and your view has not changed. > Many defendents refuse a plea bargain of "guilty&quot
6.
by hahainternet 8y ago
> why do they have a sex offender registry? We have a Violent and Sex Offender Register: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violent_and_Sex_Offender_Regis... It is not public, it exists to facilitate Police intelligence.
7.
by hahainternet 8y ago
Except that if you click the link, that's not what this means.
8.
by hahainternet 8y ago
> I was willing to tolerate Ledger's issues here ... if they fixed them > Unfortunately, the Ledger team appear to be asshats, so there's every reason to fear using them in the future, even if they've fixed this specifi
9.
by hahainternet 9y ago
Perhaps someone could help me. Lightning seems quite sound in theory, but I have misgivings about the order in which a fresh transaction is signed, and the secret to the old transaction revealed. It would seem that by interrupting this chai
10.
by hahainternet 9y ago
The link you've posted a) Does not work b) Seems to be specific to Ethereum c) According to a mirror, has its information sourced from an unverified Reddit post. Is there anything but FUD here?
11.
by hahainternet 9y ago
> 3 days? In contrast, your liability is capped at $500 if you inform your bank of debit card fraud within 60 days. Unless your bank considers the fraud to have been caused by a lack of care on your behalf, in which case you will not be
12.
by hahainternet 9y ago
You need to physically connect your premesis to the middlemen. In lightning, you need only virtually connect them. There's a literal world of difference between the two.
13.
by hahainternet 9y ago
I noticed you've posted the same thing in many different posts with increasing inaccuracy. > instead they have to be given permission to transact by monolithic liquidity hubs Completely false > who of course must take their own f
14.
by hahainternet 9y ago
> lol, with lightning you have to rely on a small number of centralized payment hubs There is no requirement for this. This is FUD.
15.
by hahainternet 9y ago
Is what `end-users should care about` any business of yours? I don't mean that insultingly, I mean genuinely. I think renaming a bunch of packages with a prefix is probably silly, but your response also strikes me as incredibly prescri
16.
by hahainternet 9y ago
I wasn't really asking for a suggestion, more pointing out that it isn't some previously solved and agreed upon issue. It's something that has to be picked, and the parent poster will undoubtedly count as 'arrogance&#x27
17.
by hahainternet 9y ago
> Except it's less than clear that this is an "invalid username" Indeed, and once that was pointed out his response was equally polite and accurate, offering a workaround which keeps everyone happy. Literally, what more do
18.
by hahainternet 9y ago
> The fact the software doesn't do what any sensible user would expect is completely irrelevant to Poettering. Logs and error and continues? I think you're confused by Systemd exposing all sorts of frailties of traditional soft
19.
by hahainternet 9y ago
> "Trolls" have not forced anythings - just standard systemd developer behavior. They've had to delete multiple posts from the thread which are nothing but trolls, hell YOUR post is nothing but a troll.
20.
by hahainternet 9y ago
Are you reading the same thread as me? He replied explaining precisely why this is an error and received nothing but hate for it, 40 thumbs downs. On the other hand, you come here to uselessly complain and have the temerity to complain that
21.
by hahainternet 11y ago
> Brining up the most horrible of crimes to justify a particular argument for increasing the powers of law enforcement is an obvious attempt to appeal to emotion, rather than to experience. No it's actually an appeal to both. The in
22.
by hahainternet 11y ago
> Can we not drag this down to the media scare tactic that is child pornography? You mean can we not use the crime Apple has essentially made impossible to secure a conviction on? No, I'm sorry. Kids being raped matters. > For ev
23.
by hahainternet 11y ago
> Likewise, there are cases where someone has encrypted the only evidence against him, and the State has no right to compel him to decrypt that evidence. My country does. > How often is any crime perfect, anyway? Significantly more of
24.
by hahainternet 11y ago
> Are you also in favor of DNA typing and fingerprinting everyone at birth into a national database? Yeah this has a lot of benefits and helps catch criminals extremely quickly. It has virtually no privacy implications. I'm fine wit
25.
by hahainternet 11y ago
> Bad guys use cars, but we don't require cars to come with remote kill switches. Nobody is asking for a remote kill switch. Searching a car is a common task, searching a phone should be the same. > Let's think about the imp
26.
by hahainternet 11y ago
> Should we put in place ubiquitous video and audio surveillance in every square foot of the country just in case the FBI ever wants to review something that happened? In public areas that are often visited? Absolutely yes, an unbiased s
27.
by hahainternet 11y ago
> If the needs of the many don't outweigh the needs of the few, then why does the total number of criminals matter? Because the victims matter. > If I want to buy strong encryption with no backdoor, and I'm not a criminal, t
28.
by hahainternet 11y ago
> So you are saying Apple is only helping criminals with encryptions? No I'm saying that arrogantly the people behind these decisions cannot imagine a scenario in which someone else could hold information about them that would be ha
29.
by hahainternet 11y ago
> I disagree with your healthcare analogy. It is in the interest of the many for the US to have widespread, cheap, available healthcare. It would give our citizens longer, healthier lives, which from a purely economic standpoint would al
30.
by hahainternet 11y ago
> Nonsense! Believe it or not, prior to the existence of smart phones it was possible to convict people of abuse and rape; in fact, it happened quite regularly. The evidence against such criminals need not be on a smartphone; after all,

More ›