hagbarth

5 ms·

1.
by hagbarth 3mo ago
No you will still get access to newer models on the subscription. You should have access to Sonnet 5, which is new. It's just Mythos class models that are API only. For now... You never know with these companies.
2.
by hagbarth 3mo ago
It was not.
3.
by hagbarth 3mo ago
Yes, but I don’t see either of those scenarios giving them the growth needed to justify a trillion dollar valuation. Especially with the current competition (a competitor releases a much better model, and they have to respond or see their r
4.
by hagbarth 3mo ago
Well. $60b in bloated stock is probably much better than the $10b cash penalty for not going through with the deal.
5.
by hagbarth 3mo ago
The alternative is to be explicit when you nerf, so users know what they are working with.
6.
by hagbarth 4mo ago
Because 5 days is not enough for the market to discover the price of SpaceX. And the rules were changed so the float is weighted as if it was much much larger than it is.
7.
by hagbarth 6mo ago
Danish public broadcaster. Probably the best reputation in the world on Danish news.
8.
by hagbarth 6mo ago
Do you have any hard lines for what an AI should be able to generate for you?
9.
by hagbarth 7mo ago
> Do you have evidence for that? Check the post history. It’s pretty obvious
10.
by hagbarth 7mo ago
I have no idea why they would do that. Outside blatant corruption, which we shouldn't discount.
11.
by hagbarth 7mo ago
Also if a person always wanted to write a book I don’t think prompting an AI will scratch that itch.
12.
by hagbarth 7mo ago
Except the models don’t actually compute anything other than text generation. The entire way they interact with computers is through the shell or other api layers on the OS
13.
by hagbarth 8mo ago
> and might be the renaissance for small to one person game studios. Indie games are already bigger than ever as far as I know.
14.
by hagbarth 8mo ago
How so?
15.
by hagbarth 8mo ago
This isn’t a political move. It’s a pension fund derisking a small part of their investments by moving them out of a riskier asset.
16.
by hagbarth 8mo ago
For rentals I get that. We own 2 EVs and a charger at home. Easiest driving experience ever. We just plug it in.
17.
by hagbarth 9mo ago
Graphite predates AI code reviews. Obviously includes it now, but the original selling point was support for stacking PRs.
18.
by hagbarth 9mo ago
I've seen this statement before. I'm not sure why my nation winning AI, whatever that means (first to AGI?), is better for me than some other nation?
19.
by hagbarth 9mo ago
Ah yes, proving a negative. What makes you sure a stone is not capable of cognition?
20.
by hagbarth 9mo ago
Revenue is all up. And as far as I can see beating expectations.
21.
by hagbarth 10mo ago
> People think that because AI cannot replace a senior dev, it's a worthless con. Quite the strawman. There are many points between “worthless” and “worth 100s of billions to trillions of investment”.
22.
by hagbarth 10mo ago
Sam Altman has been drumming[1] the ASI drum for a while now. I don't think it's a stretch to say that this is the vision he is selling. [1] - https://ia.samaltman.com/#:~:text=we%20will%20have-,superint...
23.
by hagbarth 10mo ago
If you read a little further in the article, the main point is _not_ that AI is useless. But rather than AGI god building, a regular technology. A valuable one, but not infinite growth.
24.
by hagbarth 10mo ago
I believe AlphaFold, AlphaEvolve etc are _not_ looking to get to AGI. The whole article is a case against AGI chasing, not ML or LLM overall.
25.
by hagbarth 10mo ago
"You're absolutely right!"
26.
by hagbarth 11mo ago
I agree with that. It's a bet they have to make. They are just in a worse position to make it than some of the other companies.
27.
by hagbarth 11mo ago
I'm not so sure. I, for one, do not think purely by talking to myself. I do that sometimes, but a lot of the time when I am working through something, I have many more dimensions to my thought than inner speech.
28.
by hagbarth 11mo ago
But Meta specifically needs returns from AI products to justify the capex. Google and Microsoft eg. have profitable cloud businesses from where they can rent out GPU compute. Meta’s bet is far more risky.
29.
by hagbarth 1y ago
They will still need to learn to recognise if the output from AI is good or not.
30.
by hagbarth 1y ago
Version control is different since it’s collaboration with the rest of the org. The rest: if they are just as productive as others, I would not care one bit. Tool use as a metric is just bad.

More ›