hacknews6

8 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by hacknews6 2y ago

   It would absolutely be better. Think of how many Trump voters are disenfranchised in California. Think of how many Harris voters are disenfranchised in Alabama. The president represents everyone, and yet, seven random states will actually m
2. 2.▲
   by hacknews6 2y ago

   Yes, because as we all know, despite winning, 50.5% isn't enough of a margin, so actually, the loser should win instead.
3. 3.▲
   by hacknews6 2y ago

   Please explain how 10 > 5, and that makes 5 the winner.
4. 4.▲
   by hacknews6 2y ago

   And the outcomes are frequently undemocratic. Only in America is it fair for the smaller number to be bigger than the bigger number, which just so happens to conveniently benefit the minority, who then twist themselves into knots to "w
5. 5.▲
   by hacknews6 2y ago

   That's a bold statement considering it is utterly incorrect.