h_r

6 ms·

1.
by h_r 3y ago
That's what I was thinking... Why can't we solve this with non-repudiation crypto that is already available?
2.
by h_r 4y ago
I have mixed feelings about the various arguments I see raised in the comments. It seems crazy to me to insist that efficiency and productivity gains via technology have, as their proper goal, a world in which none of that matters. Freeing
3.
by h_r 4y ago
One weak advantage is panspermia allows you to avoid the question.
4.
by h_r 4y ago
That seems to be an odd way of looking at it, IMO. Most of the time, the entire point of building an API is to present consistent functionality to any consumer, not only ones under your control. Also, a well-behaved API is versioned so as
5.
by h_r 6y ago
Are there significant risks from running virtualization locally like this? If so, can you provide any links or elaborate a bit so I can follow up? Most of what I've seen on such vulnerabilities refer to server infrastructure.
6.
by h_r 6y ago
Seems like that would require an understanding of language that far exceeds the current state of the art. And much of the time logic doesn't even apply because the text is incoherent.
7.
by h_r 6y ago
The things you cite as missing in C# can be found in F# on .NET Core. Have you ever tried it? I find it hard to stomach C# after delving deeply into F#, and you still get to use Dapper! Swagger though... not sure if anyone ever got that wor
8.
by h_r 6y ago
I'm genuinely curious if there are black or African American programmers who actually use git who are offended by the term. Speaking for myself (white programmer) it just seems to be an obvious use of the adjective form of the word as
9.
by h_r 6y ago
With respect to evolving balls of mud, the only thing that mostly worked for me is to try to find those boundaries where you can apply the [Strangler Pattern]( https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture&#x2
10.
by h_r 6y ago
This made me laugh out loud. Early this afternoon I walked by a local church on the way to do some shopping and there was a group of 8 or 9 people kneeling in front of it praying. They were holding signs with various slogans, one of which s
11.
by h_r 6y ago
I hardly know where to start with this. Parachutes are not a cliche example of anything other than engineered products that are the result of well understood principles of physics, knowledge which was hardly arrived at by magical intuition.
12.
by h_r 6y ago
Again, this is the very thing that needs to be shown. You're simply repeating the same mistake. The post I was responding to really had no _point_, per se. It merely asserted that it's ridiculous to require such experiments becaus
13.
by h_r 6y ago
It's simply a problem of what is considered to be evidence in the scientific community. If everyone "got cured by a miracle drug", that implies you already have the compelling evidence in hand that the drug, in fact, is a cur
14.
by h_r 6y ago
What... what?! You think that | ...those people recorded while spreading their spit all over a train cart. are simply acting in ignorance because they have no idea how to behave?
15.
by h_r 7y ago
A very high percentage choose to buy a house or car, or have children as part of their life planning when things look fairly stable. When you grow up and have adult responsibilities, the youthful feeling of invulnerability starts to fade.
16.
by h_r 7y ago
I don't want to discuss this forever but I have a couple of comments: Your points about efficiency are a separate topic entirely from the original claim that manually writing out an imperative solution makes it easier to see the algori
17.
by h_r 7y ago
I agree with everything you've said here but being mentally exhausted doesn't make it more likely that you can read even more lines of code in a more reliable fashion. I think the clue to your thinking, for me, is in your descript
18.
by h_r 7y ago
That's quite an interesting, if frightening, take on it. Assuming a developer knows what `map` does, then I wouldn't have very much confidence in their reading comprehension if they somehow mentally skipped over the main higher or
19.
by h_r 7y ago
Can you explain why you think it makes O(n) blocks trivial to identify? How is such identification made easier by manually writing out a `for` loop applying a function foo to each element rather than writing `map foo myCollection`?
20.
by h_r 7y ago
They could possibly do this but the logistics would be messy. For large marathons, people travel to the destination from all over the world and book hotels in the city where they can easily get to the start location. Also, seeing the city w
21.
by h_r 7y ago
The most depressing thing for me as someone who loves F# is how `.net` is nearly synonymous with C# in most people's minds
22.
by h_r 7y ago
Meetings, working on docs etc can still be billable. 8 hours straight in the zone every day? Nobody does that.
23.
by h_r 7y ago
Maven and Gradle don't run anything in a dedicated JVM. They're just tools to accomplish various goals based on your dependencies: compile, package, test, maybe deploy. Not even remotely similar to runtime module management like
24.
by h_r 7y ago
More like they have a right to their beliefs, inferior or not, as long as they don't try to impose them on me.
25.
by h_r 7y ago
I honestly fail to see what has been dishonest in the communications around this. The plan for .NET 5 does, in fact, unify .NET Standard, Core and Xamarin. These will no longer be separate things but will go forward under one name. I'm
26.
by h_r 7y ago
If you are thinking of porting an old 4.x app but you wait until some time beyond Nov 2020 ( https://i.redd.it/f8todfd66uw21.png ) then it is in your interest to track the latest .NET Standard along the way. If you haven&#x27
27.
by h_r 7y ago
> In the real world there are massive amounts of code in the .net framework. Right, I agree with everything you said here. That's exactly the reason why MS said at the Build conference that they will be supporting .NET Framework &qu
28.
by h_r 7y ago
I don't see how you reached that conclusion. Once .NET 5 arrives, there won't be any more concern with ensuring portability between .NET Core apps and .NET Framework apps by way of targeting .NET Standard. .NET Standard will be on
29.
by h_r 7y ago
Yes that's a good question. The situation today with .NET Core vs .NET Standard is: Standard is the common functionality that works in both .NET Framework and .NET Core. Standard continues to overlap more with Framework as those featur
30.
by h_r 7y ago
That's right; we'll have two incompatible .NETs for the foreseeable future but only one will be getting new features. .NET 5 will unify Core, Standard and Xamarin/Mono.

More ›