h4ny

11 ms·

1.
by h4ny 3mo ago
Noted, reviewed, and understood. I'll be more mindful. Sorry for getting caught in the moment.
2.
by h4ny 3mo ago
That's my point. You can run Qwen3.6 27B with MTP and whatever else you want to bolt onto it at 256k context for much less than even a Ryzen AI Max 395+ with 128GB would cost. Even unquantized you don't need 128 GB so given your c
3.
by h4ny 3mo ago
> In my limited experiments Qwen 3.5 (maybe 3.6 is loads better) 1. Maybe you should tell us what those limited experiments are. 2. Maybe you should actually try 3.6 because it's huge difference in most cases. Don't forget to t
4.
by h4ny 3mo ago
[flagged]
5.
by h4ny 3mo ago
Really don't mean any offence to your comment because you probably mean well but I have little tolerance for the "reasonable"/fence-sitting kind of comments on this kind of issues. If they really cared to much about empo
6.
by h4ny 3mo ago
I still can't really tell if you re(read) the article properly and it seems like you are just making assertions against what doesn't fit your _beliefs_ and just label anything that seems to deviate even just slightly with labels
7.
by h4ny 3mo ago
> I think both the AI use and the alleged extraction of knowledge of design and craft are better explained by, like, "the job got crazy popular, the labor force multiplied, a lot of less passionate people got involved, and then some
8.
by h4ny 3mo ago
If taking the sentence out of context wasn't intended, you may want to (re)read the article because 'and now suddenly "because AI" they don't?' isn't even remotely close to what is being said in that parag
9.
by h4ny 3mo ago
Was it ever a good test? How do you even objectively assess what a good pelican on a bike is anyway?
10.
by h4ny 3mo ago
I'm not an AI skeptic but I'm skeptical of the intent of this article. It makes great claims about agent-first engineering and tries to make a real case based on a real product, with real users, and a real team that's been gr
11.
by h4ny 4mo ago
You have the source to everything you use in life right? You can make your own car, patrol, shampoo, grow your own food, build your own house, wire your own electricity (and generate it), can switch to having your own reserve of drinking wa
12.
by h4ny 4mo ago
I think that's a generally good approach and a fantastic example of framing things professionally but also doesn't fix the core of the problem, which I see problematic if leadership of an engineering-focused company doesn't u
13.
by h4ny 9mo ago
> I'm being a bit facetious here... Maybe just don't do that? It's never helpful in good-faith discussions and just indicates a lack of empathy and maybe a lack of understanding of the actual issue being discussed. > So
14.
by h4ny 10mo ago
I encourage everyone to read the definition on the home page: > Definition: A gaming dark pattern is something that is deliberately added to a game to cause an unwanted negative experience for the player with a positive outcome for the g
15.
by h4ny 10mo ago
This feels like a step backwards and now people who never bothered to write proper, appropriate commit messages for others to start with can care even less. I personally don't see what the use case of this is -- you shouldn't even
16.
by h4ny 11mo ago
GGP's sentiment resonates with me. I invest a fair bit of time into LLMs to keep up on how †hings are evolving and I do throw both small and large tasks at them. I'm seeing great results with some small task but with anything that
17.
by h4ny 1y ago
Could you elaborate on what you mean by "moral basis" in your comment?
18.
by h4ny 1y ago
Not speaking for everyone but to me the problem is the normalization of bad behavior. Some people in this thread are already interpreting that policies that allow contributions of AI-generated code means it's OK to not understand the c
19.
by h4ny 1y ago
You just stop accepting contributions from them? There is nothing inherently different about these policies that make them more or less difficult to enforce than other kinds of polices.
20.
by h4ny 1y ago
> I didn't make a decision on the tradeoff, the LLVM community did. I also disclosed it in the PR. That's not what the GP mean. Just because a community doesn't disallow something doesn't mean it's the right th
21.
by h4ny 1y ago
Interesting idea! Would be nice to see: * How the colors were picked and assigned to each category and (e.g. at what point is red pink and no longer red) * An indication of distribution in charts, they have different scales on the y-axis. *
22.
by h4ny 1y ago
Take this as a additional point of reference: I don't have formal education in art and not an artist, but I find your work interesting enough that I would stop at a store to look at and probably buy something (printed and fabric) if I
23.
by h4ny 1y ago
I have been using NoScript for years and I find calling it "perfectly usable" is a bit of a stretch at least for my use case. I can only see it being "perfectly usable" if you only visit mostly the same sites most of the
24.
by h4ny 1y ago
Thanks for replying, I understand your original reasoning now in a way that I didn't when I last responded. I was only considering how it would appears to people who don't recognize Gr isn't an element, I agree that it's
25.
by h4ny 1y ago
No. The 9.14 vs. 3.14 analogy is more suitable. If you have read the blog post it's a difference between the chemical symbol Ge and Gr, which as I understand is what you would refer to as a "semantic error".
26.
by h4ny 1y ago
> I'm inclined to give them a pass. It's easy enough to figure out that it should be germanium and not gadolinium, and dyslexia already exists among scientists. People make mistakes and you probably mean well but this is also t
27.
by h4ny 1y ago
> It supposes you are able to articulate where you want to be in five years, and have the ability to break that down into actionable tasks. This is gold. :)
28.
by h4ny 1y ago
> you MUST get very good at reviewing code that you did not write. I find that interesting. That has always been the case at most places my friends and I have worked at that have proper software engineering practices, companies both very
29.
by h4ny 1y ago
What a delightful read. Thanks for all the thoughts put into the problem solving, the writing, and the presentation!
30.
by h4ny 1y ago
> As you said, the very title of the article acknowledged that it didn’t produce a working product. Then why not say "mostly didn't work"? I read the article and that's the impression I got. The OP's comment isn&

More ›