gtfierro

4 ms·

1.
by gtfierro 9y ago
It could definitely be clearer, but if you click on the name of the operating systems on that page, they'll produce a little dialog that tells you how to run Cockpit.
2.
by gtfierro 9y ago
You could, but you'd be competing with everyone else that's also making transactions so you'd need an incredible amount of computational power to outstrip that.
3.
by gtfierro 10y ago
My understanding was that until the "elephant's foot" and other radioactive lava flows were found, everyone was under the impression that there was still fuel in the reactor, which carried the possibility of a second explosio
4.
by gtfierro 10y ago
Another comment here mentioned a recent FAST paper talking about BtrDB, which can get ~16mil writes/sec (nanosecond timestamp, 8 byte values) on a single node, with near-linear speedup when clustering: https://blog.acolyer.o
5.
by gtfierro 11y ago
If you look at the "image" description files (e.g. http://essenmitsosse.de/pixel/scripts/zeus.px , linked by another comment), then it looks like the files define a set of constraints on the "compone
6.
by gtfierro 11y ago
Any left? gtfierro225 AT gmail Thanks in advance!
7.
by gtfierro 11y ago
Going beyond this being a minor optimization that isn't going to matter for most people, my guess is that they probably don't reorder structs because it may not be what the programmer intended. When you start introducing mechanism
8.
by gtfierro 11y ago
The updated readme at http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llgo/trunk/README.TXT mentions the following: "llgo is under active development. It compiles and passes most of the standard library test suite