gsaslis

9 ms·

1.
by gsaslis 4mo ago
This is a good fit primarily if you want to run a Radicle node that only seeds repos you tell it to. If you want to write code which you publish on Radicle, you need the tool that signs all your work with your private key (of your Radicle i
2.
by gsaslis 4mo ago
In a nutshell, I summarise it like this: I see Open Source Software is a public good. As a public good, it doesn't belong in any proprietary platform, nor should orgs of any kind be in a position to gate keep it. We should rather host
3.
by gsaslis 4mo ago
yes, we currently have just the base building blocks (`rad follow` - allowlist / `rad block` - blocklist) for the fancier things to be built on. When you "seed" a repository, by default you seed it only with "followed&qu
4.
by gsaslis 4mo ago
yup ! https://radicle.dev/2025/08/14/jujutsu-with-radicle
5.
by gsaslis 4mo ago
it's a little of both: on the one hand we're working on CI integrations (through generic webhooks or CI-engine-specific adapters that basically implement the CI engine's API [1]), so you can keep on using your existing CI sol
6.
by gsaslis 4mo ago
1. yes, it's in the user guide [1] 2. Git LFS should work, yes. Care to try and report back ? ;) Open a new topic on the Zulip #Support channel [2] if you run into any issues. [1] - https://radicle.dev/guides/user
7.
by gsaslis 5mo ago
yes, they're stored in git itself. See https://radicle.dev/guides/protocol#collaborative-objects
8.
The Star Chamber: Multi-LLM Consensus for Code Quality(blog.mozilla.ai)
2 points by gsaslis 6mo ago|0 comments
9.
by gsaslis 7mo ago
I didn't think I'd ever be part of any group of 7 people in the world, but today is that day, I guess. And I know one more of those people already! 5 more to go.
10.
by gsaslis 1y ago
It should! And yet, that's technically not CI. The whole point we started using automation servers as an integration point was to avoid the "it works on my machine" drama. (Have watched at least 5 seasons of it - they were
11.
by gsaslis 2y ago
So, if I understand correctly, you’re not so much concerned about the p2p architecture, rather than the default seeding policy? (You’d prefer that to be selective rather than open by default? )
12.
by gsaslis 2y ago
This is true. But what if they change their mind? IMHO, this shows the huge dependency of all of the world’s open source software on a single company. (Microsoft, who owns GitHub). In this context, Radicle - as an alternative way of hosting
13.
by gsaslis 2y ago
Probably not the "easiest", and it's not really production-ready yet, *but* it is the one open source solution for hosting open source software that will never be affected by the "Explores Sale" problem - the same w
14.
by gsaslis 2y ago
agreed. Jenkins has suffered from a lot of problems - plugin maintenance across version upgrades being key - but it has also overcome a lot of these problems. It gets criticism just for being... "old". But it is an automation ser
15.
by gsaslis 2y ago
I have to say "Datadog" isn't exactly as scary as "Microsoft" was, back when it bought GitHub. Ok, they didn't kill the open source community which is what we feared at the time (because they found a way to mak
16.
by gsaslis 2y ago
> The risk only comes in if gitlabknockoff was AWS, Azure, or GCP, which we're still learning what to do about. Exactly! It really makes me wonder how GitLab thinks Datadog can help them defend against this risk. Then again, they&#
17.
by gsaslis 3y ago
For me, one of the benefits of FOSS is that I don't have to trust the people. I can look at the code and decide for myself. Not looking to convince you of that or anything though... :)
18.
by gsaslis 3y ago
Depends on what you mean by finding : - finding what the domain name is ? - resolving the DNS to an IP address ? Radicle solves both problems in theory, but more the latter than the former right now: - there is some basic functionality to
19.
by gsaslis 3y ago
In addition, in order to migrate your GitHub issues to Radicle (which the above doesn't cover), there's this command-line tool [1] that should get you most - if not all - of the way there. Migrating GitHub Pull Requests (PRs) to R
20.
by gsaslis 3y ago
local-first [1] software ;) That is the default port for `radicle-httpd`: an HTTP API that would allow you to authenticate (using your public/private key pair, that is stored on your machine), so that you can perform actions on the web
21.
by gsaslis 3y ago
There is governance value in the token. Whoever holds that token can vote on Radworks governance proposals.
22.
by gsaslis 3y ago
Any node with "problematic" behaviour can be blocked. But please note that you can also choose a "block everyone, follow just the good ones" (i.e. a selective ) seeding policy [1]). [1] - https://docs.radicle
23.
by gsaslis 3y ago
https://docs.radicle.xyz/guides/protocol is probably a better resource (but this guide is still Work In Progress)
24.
by gsaslis 3y ago
Yes, radicle is built on top of git and even uses git as its storage backend for its own data model. [1] has more details on how Radicle depends on git. [1] https://app.radicle.xyz/nodes/seed.radicle.xyz/rad:z3trNY
25.
by gsaslis 3y ago
Yes, this is how radicle stores this data. ; ) https://app.radicle.xyz/nodes/seed.radicle.xyz/rad:z3trNYnLW...
26.
by gsaslis 11y ago
absolutely terrible... Atlassian has just lost my appreciation.. look at DigitalOcean about how it should be done: http://www.fastcompany.com/3048196/greek-startups-cut-off-fr...