grumio

8 ms·

1.
by grumio 3mo ago
He was helping up a woman that was on the ground. LEO needlessly got involved and started and escalated the "shoving match." Dude. LEO shot him on purpose. You use the passive voice like it was a natural disaster or accident. He h
2.
by grumio 3mo ago
Was that the day he died? Or earlier?
3.
by grumio 3mo ago
you claim Pretti interfered with LE from performing their duties. What causes you to believe that?
4.
by grumio 6mo ago
Do you think surrendering combatants should be killed?
5.
by grumio 8mo ago
He doesn't even have to lie about what he meant. Trump-whisperers like 0xy do it for free.
6.
by grumio 8mo ago
Allll of your comments have been disparaging Pretti, and his attitude, his intentions, and so on. It is obvious. Only when you're called out, do you mention self defense. Glad to see you have shame. Bye.
7.
by grumio 8mo ago
You keep implying it without explicitly saying it: You, ljsprague, believe Alex Pretti was executed for committing an offense. Do you dispute this?
8.
by grumio 8mo ago
Was he executed for committing an offense(which is what you seem to be getting at, by making assumptions about Pretti, instead of focusing on self-defense)? I hope you don't think that, that would be honestly disgusting. I'd stron
9.
by grumio 8mo ago
having a gun = intent to interfere? Interesting. Does having intent to interfere deserve execution? Oh edit to add: did he interfere? And if so how?
10.
by grumio 8mo ago
Unclear to me if he was a protestor, he seemed to just be a guy with a camera phone and tried to help a woman stand up. What are you implying, ljsprague?
11.
by grumio 8mo ago
I'm taking a charitable interpretation of your take for sure. I do see the value of additional levers, but I don't think realistically it would be feasible to make such a court. Counter-point: I don't think Chauvin would&#x27
12.
by grumio 8mo ago
Welcome to the free marketplace of ideas, dude. Talk about the issue I'm talking about instead of ranting on some vague generalization about how "believing your own eyes" is bad sometimes, thus is always bad??? If someone wer
13.
by grumio 8mo ago
If someone has a firearm and resists arrest... you arrest him. Is there proof of lethal self-defence being required? Then show the proof of that, nothing has come out in support of that. Your hypothetical is big, if true... but it's no
14.
by grumio 8mo ago
You're welcome. Happy to see evidence and call it like it is. I trust my eyes over billionare-funded Fox News and authority figures, which is your perspective I could get anywhere.
15.
by grumio 8mo ago
And yet the videos show that they didn't enforce the law. It's right there in the videos.
16.
by grumio 8mo ago
You spend more time posting excuses to not read than it would take to read. You don't deserve a pardon for not clicking on a link...
17.
by grumio 8mo ago
DHS lies as easily as they breathe. They have proven they cannot be believed. A previous example: You can watch the video for yourself of an ICE masked thug grabbing a man's carotid artery, when NOT facing a deadly threat, against DOJ
18.
by grumio 8mo ago
They should be seen in a normal court like the rest of us peasants. No star courts.
19.
by grumio 8mo ago
They're not simply enforcing laws on the books. They're breaking them. https://abcnews.go.com/US/lawyers-allege-dept-homeland-secur... DHS denying legal council to detainees. https://www.propublica
20.
by grumio 8mo ago
> they didn’t arrest the co-conspirator that egged the decedent on Glad to see you've abandoned trying to defend your lie that shooting at a vehicle is self-defence and moved on to another nonsense argument. But co-conspirator in wh
21.
by grumio 8mo ago
They did do something wrong. Shooting at a vehicle is not self defense. That is a DOJ rule which no doubt you've seen in these several threads you frequent and troll.
22.
by grumio 8mo ago
He wasn't hit. Is he in the hospital or something, do you have a source for that? he didn't even fall over. > Tit for tat! He shot her 3 times, she shot him 0 times. You're expressing glee over her death. You are sick.
23.
by grumio 8mo ago
Thanks. I wonder why parent commenter likes and trusts him to interpret a killing on video. Weird.
24.
by grumio 8mo ago
I watched the video too. Not sure what a 33 min Asmongold stream(your link) has to do with it. Does he add some valuable analysis? What's his authority or expertise on the matter?
25.
by grumio 8mo ago
They murdered someone today. They did not follow their training.
26.
by grumio 8mo ago
Nope. Stop spreading lies please, cmxch.
27.
by grumio 11mo ago
>True that a majority of the electorate voted for No, it was a plurality, not a majority. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidentia...
28.
by grumio 11mo ago
Uline https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/12/uline-trump-...
29.
by grumio 11mo ago
Who are these people that are being cancelled, that have "scientific evidence" to contradict the "Progressive views"? What topics?
30.
by grumio 11mo ago
> someone with integrity, like Trump Can you provide some examples of Trump showing integrity? Yesterday he posted an AI slop video of him bombing protestors with poop while wearing a crown, so I'm skeptical. https://nypo

More ›