growlNark

4 ms·

1.
by growlNark 1y ago
I actually think I may have misunderstood, and this doesn't upload to mapillary by default. ...but that said, what is the kind of person to upload specific times and places where they were to a private corporation? What would motivate
2.
by growlNark 1y ago
Yea but like... why? Typically you use human language operators to produce readable phrases, and this doesn't even approach readable english.
3.
by growlNark 1y ago
> Embracing Resource Acquisition Is Initialization (RAII) makes C++ the safest, most productive and fun C++ has ever been. This seems like an extremely low bar. Anyway, what use is there for C++ in 2025 aside from maintenance of legacy c
4.
by growlNark 1y ago
Why do they use "and"? Why not use an unambiguous joining token like `/`? This just feels like an abuse of informal language to produce fundamentally formal data. As it stands, it certainly does not resemble readable or pars
5.
by growlNark 1y ago
Wait, this code uploads data to a server somewhere ? To what end? I would not have expected capture to come with mandatory redistribution, nor would I trust any third party with my location, let alone the output of my car's camera fee
6.
by growlNark 1y ago
Tbh, I really don't think there's much of value in the constitution for most people. It seems easier to characterize as a fig leaf for the crimes the state commits against its citizens (see eg our prisons, or our treatment of immi
7.
by growlNark 1y ago
Update: in my mind, this reflects analytics of queries. Just further reason to run your own models I guess....
8.
by growlNark 1y ago
Both literally imposed tariffs. How can you not compare and group them?
9.
by growlNark 1y ago
Eh even the nonreligious are still pretty culturally christian. This especially bubbles up during conversations about immigration
10.
by growlNark 1y ago
Hostels often offer private rooms, to varying degree of privacy. But i've certainly stayed at hostels that offer very comfortable single private rooms with private bathrooms for a third the cost of a local hotel room. Expensive for a h
11.
by growlNark 1y ago
I think you distinguished them admirably. It tends to be pretty obvious from context which meaning is intended. Hell, we use "design language" even if it's clearly not language; i see little reason why this should be differen
12.
by growlNark 1y ago
Very interesting. Cheers, thanks for the read!
13.
by growlNark 1y ago
Hostels are wonderful for single traveling, though. And that's in spite of the fact that hostels also have bulk discounts.
14.
by growlNark 1y ago
Ah yea, sorry, I mean in addition to what we already know for sure—Timbuktu is emphatically not what I was referring to (although—I had forgotten about Timbuktu libraries, and it makes my point better than I did, so I appreciate your bringi
15.
by growlNark 1y ago
This has the added complication that oral historians were/are a political institution in many parts of the continent (unlike, say, reproducers of folklore). So "official" history very clearly predates written history we hav
16.
by growlNark 1y ago
I highly recommend reading about the Levellers. It might be the only democratic movement in Britain until the 20th century.
17.
by growlNark 1y ago
> Subsidies encourage over production That's largely acceptable, and certainly preferable to under production, for resources that we simply can't do without. Dairy was (and still is) considered one of those resources as a supe
18.
by growlNark 1y ago
I'm fine with calling it language. We have other ways of feeling special.
19.
by growlNark 1y ago
> No; the deal is massive wealth creation and rapid improvements in material prosperity. It isn't necessary to let businessmen who likely aren't even loyal to the people who live here dictate how your state is run to get this b
20.
by growlNark 1y ago
Something tells me neither cursor nor openai need write workloads, so they would probably do just as fine using a flat file. I'm honestly curious what use either would have for queries that you couldn't get with a filesystem. Cert
21.
by growlNark 1y ago
Look you can take trade court seriously, but to me it will always be a sign of the inherent incompetence of states at approximating models of economies that represent how humans actually want to trade. So fuckem; what good do they really do
22.
by growlNark 1y ago
Well, let me amend this. An ancap economy is certainly possible. Whether it looks anything like (neo)keynsian macro markets is another story—but economies are always possible. But yes, in general, stable societies should be extremely ag
23.
by growlNark 1y ago
> You called GDPR a 'trade barrier' as a justification for tariffs against the EU so it's extremely obvious you're not arguing from any position of good faith at all here. The least interesting commentary you can imag
24.
by growlNark 1y ago
Yes, they are the default. What do you think ancaps think about all day? It ain't fucking democracy.
25.
by growlNark 1y ago
> There's an Amendment process for updating the Constitution. It's been used many times, most recently in 1992. Ok? Why would we go through that when we could just chuck that bitch off a cliff and start fresh? Are you trapped i
26.
by growlNark 1y ago
> Then change it through amendments. Doesn't really matter when the amendments go through the same electoral structure. I.e. if the electoral structure weren't fucked, there would be recent amendments worth discussing. Or else
27.
by growlNark 1y ago
Well, sure. a trade court is a symptom of trade. You don't have a trade court without trade, just like you wouldn't have a family court without family or a traffic court without traffic. But the entire premise of the private marke
28.
by growlNark 1y ago
> You’re describing a court whose history traces closer to the founding of our republic than to the present day This is certainly no less damning. However, it is very illustrative of our colorful history: trade above humans!
29.
by growlNark 1y ago
> What the constitution seeks to avoid is consolidation of all the government’s powers under a single entity Yes, wealthy inter-state individuals would be so much better. Right?
30.
by growlNark 1y ago
> Isn’t the point of our government structure to stop any one person from acting like a king. America clearly forgot the workplace if this was the intent. I would also stop holding your breath if you're expecting courts to start act

More ›