Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
groestl
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
groestl
3d ago
> the problem seems pretty clearly to be the impossible goals, which cause them to go crazier and crazier trying to complete them And if you think about it, humans in coorporations face very similar situations and choose to bypass regula
2.
▲
by
groestl
6d ago
I hate them because I seem to be the only adult that sees the kid kicking out another kid's teeth, or hurting them elsewhere.
3.
▲
by
groestl
9d ago
> Fifty, maybe a hundred violinists in the entire world do earn a pure living Coming from Vienna, that can't be right. This city alone breaks that assumption with it's largest 4 orchestras combined.
4.
▲
by
groestl
17d ago
When cows have phosphorus deficiency, they occasionally eat small birds, rodents, insects, or bones
5.
▲
by
groestl
18d ago
Of course there's many reasons to make something worse intentionally. Revenge for example.
6.
▲
by
groestl
19d ago
Thumbs up, let's settle on that translation
7.
▲
by
groestl
19d ago
Isn't "split the bill" something that the restaurant does?
8.
▲
by
groestl
20d ago
I though it was Winston Churchill? Anyways, from experience, I think it's true.
9.
▲
by
groestl
20d ago
> most people are just too poor to afford them I think a resource consumption based tax model extends very neatly to a UBI model. One could think of as: "this is the basic resource consumption we allow each person" and it autom
10.
▲
by
groestl
20d ago
And I think that is a major mistake, has many unwanted side effects, and only works because work supply does not yet exceed demand, so the taxes still keep flowing. But the relationship is beginning to break and I think a resource consumpti
11.
▲
by
groestl
20d ago
I'm fully in favor of a social safety net (a proper UBI even), but the tax system should tax what we don't want / keep within bounds, and I think in general we want more automation and more free time. So we should tax resourc
12.
▲
by
groestl
23d ago
To be fair, the source mentions the upside ("Although improving Service accessibility is beneficial [...]") Seems like bureaucracy was added as a subtle way to introduce rate limits, and AI is challenging that mechanism.
13.
▲
by
groestl
23d ago
> the cost of building those unique shaped legos explodes with the size of the lego piece required. The cost of plastic injection molding is almost entirely due to the cost of creating the steel mold. My argument is: with LLMs we are ent
14.
▲
by
groestl
23d ago
The efficiency argument I accept, it's surely one main driver why systems tend to form and centralize and one important factor in the balance. Still, one can observe the weird things humans and AIs do when trying to dance around the ga
15.
▲
by
groestl
23d ago
We might not even need libraries after all, since APIs, libraries and abstractions in general exist for humans to grasp complexities. Abstractions have their merits, but they have downsides too, and AI might be a way to solve them. The inte
16.
▲
by
groestl
1mo ago
Simple toolchain which supports trivial lightweight deployment is my go to attribute to select Go in projects.
17.
▲
by
groestl
2mo ago
The signal is the ceiling.
18.
▲
by
groestl
2mo ago
Intuitively I'd say lashing out on an LLM overconstraints it and so worsens the output, therefore the skill to stay calm and neutral is useful for guiding a machine as well. Would be useful to have data on that.
19.
▲
by
groestl
2mo ago
> It wasn't written by a human so they see no human value in it. Which is true, in a way, the data put down as documentation can now be calculated in seconds, and documentation is just a cache.
20.
▲
by
groestl
2mo ago
AI is what we were missing to be fully cooked. Quite literally.
21.
▲
by
groestl
3mo ago
> we still have to keep them chugging along on Java 8 There's something else amiss here. Compared to other platforms, upgrading Java, even on complex codebases, has never been a nightmare for me.
22.
▲
by
groestl
3mo ago
I can prove I'm human by losing a claw machine.
23.
▲
by
groestl
3mo ago
Maybe plan itself was also generated by an LLM
24.
▲
by
groestl
4mo ago
Maybe managers going back to coding.
25.
▲
by
groestl
4mo ago
More money right?
26.
▲
by
groestl
4mo ago
I guess they just close the PR.
27.
▲
by
groestl
5mo ago
And recruiter agents still do.
28.
▲
by
groestl
6mo ago
If you're able to predict, you're able to simulate.
29.
▲
by
groestl
6mo ago
> are so evenly matched It's because the real value of the models is in what we (humanity) fed them, and all of them have eaten the same thing for free.
30.
▲
by
groestl
6mo ago
Well, my business would be paying the trips, and everybody still refuses. So it's not the money.
More ›