greghatch

7 ms·

1.
by greghatch 7y ago
Yeah - but how would they know what is legally enforceable or not? It's really complicated and I don't think it's reasonable to assume people have access to a clear answer on enforceability and certainly not an answer they co
2.
by greghatch 7y ago
> “It hit me that I had no idea what he was talking about, or what I was doing,” Montañez recalled. “I was shaking, and I damn near wanted to pass out…[but] I opened my arms and I said, ‘This much market share!’ I didn’t even know how ri
3.
by greghatch 9y ago
That's not entirely comforting
4.
by greghatch 9y ago
This analogy is great, thanks.
5.
by greghatch 9y ago
In a sense, yes. However, I think the farmers in this analogy were more willing/able to be nomadic in the earlier days of osx and ios apps, where now they are much more likely to make the land their permanent home. This could be becaus
6.
by greghatch 9y ago
My intention was to show why comparing the two things you mentioned and claiming the comparison is outrageous was not a reasonable dismissal of OP's concern - because they were talking about the similarities of society predicated on we
7.
by greghatch 9y ago
The negatives need not be so similar for the two to occupy the same space of vast property ownership concerns - namely that a single person has what many consider to be a troubling amount of wealth and power. EDIT: sentence structure change
8.
by greghatch 10y ago
> One would think that this should be enough to put at rest any possible suspicion. But, it wasn't. People were still suspicious - and in his working with kids it doesn't make sense to "take a risk" on an allegedly ex
9.
by greghatch 10y ago
> But time crystals aren't perpetual motion just by dint of not being closed systems at all, so they're kind of neither here nor there. Literally!
10.
by greghatch 10y ago
I mean, it does if the culture is to turn a blind eye to managers that do this. Of course, from what I can tell, there's far more than one problem manager involved in all this.
11.
by greghatch 10y ago
It's a little tone deaf to offer "should've done it this way!" as advice to a person already in a bad way. Unless OP is asking for better processes to avoid this in the future, I think it's not a good idea to offer
12.
by greghatch 10y ago
I think you might be too YOUNG to get it. I think older people love the idea of interacting with a computer with voice - it's way easier for someone to get a quick answer with voice if they're otherwise unfamiliar with navigating
13.
by greghatch 10y ago
There are many that view holy books as a collection of historical accounts given by visionaries or in witness of visionaries - those that view it as "merely" a book of facts to take or leave can still hold this view, and can still
14.
by greghatch 10y ago
Sleeping dogs are actually quite honest in my experience.
15.
by greghatch 10y ago
I don't think you're reading the comment correctly. The comment is not proposing that falsely accusing more people will solve any problems. EDIT: gender agnostic phrasing
16.
by greghatch 10y ago
I think that was his point, he's critical of Amazon because they lied about their reasoning for not carrying the products, not questioning the legality of not carrying specific products. I thought that was obvious, and a charitable int
17.
by greghatch 11y ago
It's not reasonable to assume that a human changed their mind that quickly. The idea of putting out an offer with the intention of changing your mind and letting a computer handle that process cements the point that its not a change of
18.
by greghatch 12y ago
If it's hidden, then its assumed to be unprecedented until evidence presents otherwise. There aren't going to be forward assumptions of precedents without evidence.