greesil

6 ms·

1.
by greesil 3d ago
Not trivial, not impossible
2.
by greesil 14d ago
Boo. I was delighted by its introduction in pixel 8. I thought this was a resurgence of the old Google, actually giving a f about software, security and the end user. iPhone 17 has it now. maybe Google's work here is done https:&#x2F
3.
by greesil 22d ago
Nope, it looks pretty bleak for my kids if I extrapolate this bs out, and saddle them with the expectations of go to college get a job.
4.
by greesil 22d ago
I enjoyed this Veritasium video on the subject, which includes Penrose Diagrams. https://youtu.be/6akmv1bsz1M
5.
by greesil 26d ago
They do slow them down a bit
6.
by greesil 26d ago
Don't forget that the debt to geo ratio is only 120%. Japan was able to get up to 200% in a low interest the rate environment.
7.
by greesil 1mo ago
Tradewars
8.
by greesil 1mo ago
I don't think they give a flying fart a about their users anymore, but yes.
9.
by greesil 1mo ago
Time to send in the ground troops. Nothing bad can happen. /s
10.
1877–1878 El Niño event(en.wikipedia.org)
5 points by greesil 2mo ago|0 comments
11.
by greesil 2mo ago
Or written by AI. Or commented on by AI.
12.
by greesil 2mo ago
> Agents will explode the use 100x or more That _could_ happen, but very likely not in a short enough timeline to save them. > In fact spacex story tells you next : investments in infrastructure is the best investment ROFLMAO. How&#x2
13.
by greesil 2mo ago
I think Ed's argument is that given the infra investment the revenue won't be enough to pay back the original investors. In fact cheaper models make this worse for them. Who cares about the investors? Well it turns out the infra w
14.
by greesil 2mo ago
Because stage 3 would be something like Kessler Syndrome. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome
15.
Leak Reveals Possible Secret Russia-China Military Plan to Disable Starlink(united24media.com)
7 points by greesil 2mo ago|3 comments
16.
by greesil 4mo ago
If you were anticipating the stock to drop sharply in the future, this may be cheaper.
17.
by greesil 4mo ago
Their only accountability is to the stock price. The insanity will continue.
18.
by greesil 4mo ago
Because nobody reputable reported on it?
19.
by greesil 4mo ago
Capital, politicians, conservatives, libertarians,
20.
by greesil 4mo ago
I doubt it's the greatest given all that's happened in the past year. But it's certainly up there, no pun intended.
21.
by greesil 4mo ago
But me asking questions is in fact my trying to understand, is it not? I ask a stupid simple question with a slightly rude tone, and then I get downvoted by a bunch of pedantic insiders. Although to be fair it appears some are trying to hel
22.
by greesil 4mo ago
Server load, for sure.
23.
by greesil 4mo ago
How do you know this? I'm not trying to attack your statement, I am genuinely curious how anyone knows anything about model performance outside of benchmarks that are already in the training set.
24.
by greesil 4mo ago
Yes, I understand one function of jargon, which can be useful to insiders in that it conveys a precise meaning. But, it can be confusing to outsiders, and that is also a useful thing for insiders. In the context of LLMs, what other function
25.
by greesil 4mo ago
But the probability vector is the output of the LLM, no?
26.
by greesil 4mo ago
It's a comment. On Hacker News. Not the RL subreddit, or whatever. I'm just amazed at the jargon. I'm sure it's useful, but one could just call it model output.
27.
by greesil 4mo ago
Wtf is a policy? Is this some sort of RL thing that I'm too ML to understand? Gemini tells me it's the probability of the next token for an LLM. Okay then.
28.
AI research papers are getting better, and it's a big problem for scientists(theverge.com)
3 points by greesil 4mo ago|0 comments
29.
by greesil 4mo ago
"This is notably fast given that this is the first time that an Android driver bug I reported was patched within 90 days of the vendor first learning about the vulnerability." This makes me feel better about Google, but also makes
30.
by greesil 4mo ago
Which comments?

More ›