greensoap

7 ms·

1.
by greensoap 27d ago
University of Chicago's policy is more interesting: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/ai-strategy-statement
2.
by greensoap 2mo ago
JCLPCB and who? Having a board made and assembled was both great in speed and effort, and terrible in cost markup when you add tarrifs on a $50 uc at 5 board minimum.
3.
by greensoap 2mo ago
Even if the weights are just made through traditional training and no AI is used to make the weights... is there a copyright right? If the weights are a numerical derivation that aren't made by a human is there even human expression? A
4.
by greensoap 3mo ago
20 years is the max length of nearly all patents. So you really aren't giving them any concession there. Also, all patents are monopoly. That is actually what a patent provides, it provides a limited government sanctioned monopoly over
5.
by greensoap 5mo ago
the real issue is that the Thaler case was a different question: "Can AI be an author?" and the lower Court said no and SCOTUS left it along. But the question of "what is enough for the human to be the author" wasn'
6.
by greensoap 5mo ago
Also, I don't think there is any example testing the conclusion. There is no case to point at that any of the factors they listed are sufficient to convey authorship. Would love to be pointed to a case where rejecting decisions and red
7.
by greensoap 7mo ago
It will just be an arms race if we try to prove "not genAI." Detectors will improve, genAI will improve without marking (opensource and state actors will have unmarked genAI even if we mandate it). Marking real from lense through
8.
by greensoap 10mo ago
Cost -- it is way cheaper to use IPR and avoid discovery associated with the other factors that happen at trial. Speed, the PTO is generally faster.
9.
by greensoap 10mo ago
There is a fairly vocal contingent of patent people on LinkedIn swearing this is good for the solo guy, the small independent inventor. But yes, it does feel like it will be trolls that are in favor -- maybe some pharma wants this.
10.
by greensoap 10mo ago
There was an extension. I don't have link handy, but an extra 15 days were provided.
11.
by greensoap 11mo ago
Generally curious, I don't see anything about hardware. Isn't this is about making a login that doesn't require you to login to MS's cloud. Also, what HW restriction does Microsoft want? Why do they care?
12.
by greensoap 1y ago
That is only relevant to whether it is fair use not to whether the copying is an infringement. Fair use is what is called an affirmative defense -- it means that yes what I did was technically a violation but is forgiven. So on technicali
13.
by greensoap 1y ago
Actually, the court really only said downloading a pirated book to store in your "library" was bad. The opinion is intentionally? ambiguous on whether the decision regarding copies used to train an LLM applies only to scanned bo
14.
by greensoap 1y ago
A point of clarifications and some questions. The portion the court said was bad was not Anthropic getting books from pirated sites to train its model. The court opined that training the model was fair use and did not distinguish between
15.
by greensoap 1y ago
The 500,000 number is the number of books that are part of the settlement. If they downloaded all of Libgen and the other sources it was more like >7Million. But it is a lot of work to determine which books can legitimately be part of th
16.
by greensoap 1y ago
According to the judge, they didn't. The judge said they stored those books in a general purpose library for future use just in case they decided to use them later. It appears the judge took much issue with the downloading of "pir
17.
by greensoap 1y ago
Anthropic legally purchased the books it used to train its model according to the judge. And the judge said that was fine. Anthropic also downloaded books from a pirate site and the judge said that was bad -- even though the judge also said
18.
by greensoap 1y ago
Anthropic literally did exactly this to train its models according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit found that Anthropic didn't even use the pirated books to train its model. So there is that
19.
by greensoap 1y ago
In a prior ruling, the court stated that Anthropic didn't train on the books subject to this settlement. The record is that Anthropic scanned physical books and used those for training. The pirated books were being held in a general pu
20.
by greensoap 1y ago
There is a difference between localized inflammation that is bringing the source of healing to injury and systemic inflammation
21.
by greensoap 2y ago
In California at least there is no law preventing the jury from talking to anyone about the case AFTER the jury returns its decision.
22.
by greensoap 2y ago
All that build up and not a link to be seen?!?! Where do I go to spend $ on a new hobby I didn't need?
23.
by greensoap 2y ago
Why didn't I think of that?
24.
by greensoap 2y ago
I think this is relevant; but does anyone know of any software that is able to tag photos based on quality- like blur, framing, composition. We have too many photos. So many duplicates from the same day. I’ve dreamed of something that would
25.
by greensoap 3y ago
Also, the sims can introduce error and distance matters (too far away and you won't receive the VORs signal --- mountain in the way, you won't get the signal). Like in a real plane.
26.
by greensoap 3y ago
Going “on tilt” is when you make emotional decisions because you are chasing the wins or running from the losses.
27.
by greensoap 3y ago
It is trained on Adobe Stock and supplemented with openly licensed and public domain content. https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2023/03/21/responsible-inn...
28.
by greensoap 3y ago
Once you get past your checkride there is virtually zero math involved in flying. I regularly fly in and around the SF Bay Area and I don’t do a single math problem when flying. I would not let that fear stop You. Flying is too awesome.
29.
by greensoap 3y ago
Everyone in aviation is moving to electronic flight bags. Military, commercial, non-commercial. The US Airforce moved to iPads 10 years ago -- https://www.zdnet.com/article/u-s-air-force-plans-50m-saving...
30.
by greensoap 3y ago
12 months in the US. And many many foreign jurisdictions will use your publication to block your patent

More ›