green1

5 ms·

1.
by green1 7y ago
> But your comment was way over from the beginning. Honestly bemused by this. How is the following single sentence way over the line , other than the parts I quoted (which amount to about half of it)? So your personal experience d
2.
by green1 7y ago
> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive You think the post I replied to doesn't break (at the very least) that rule? Perhaps if you came down harder on the in-crowd high karma posters, ot
3.
by green1 7y ago
It's about fake views, not fake or copied news. The first site was copying articles (and banned by Google) but the Laredo one doesn't seem to be.
4.
by green1 7y ago
Maybe Google is different (and this is not about ads), but I don't believe for one second that I'm being tracked on Youtube by anything other than fingerprinting (or some other method unrelated to IP and cookies). I don't eve
5.
by green1 7y ago
>> Aside from [...] libel
6.
by green1 7y ago
Aside from Holocaust denial, hate speech and libel how does the US differ from "Europe" in terms of free speech?
7.
by green1 7y ago
I'm surprised I had to scroll this far for this comment, which was exactly my thought after viewing the Github page. From other comments here I assumed it did something sinister/sophisticated (matching photos, avatars or even text
8.
by green1 7y ago
I'm just wondering if people who claimed to believe Bitcoin would end the banking system came up with that amongst themselves or were basing it on something "Satoshi" had said. I had the impression Satoshi was relatively matt
9.
by green1 7y ago
Did the creator himself seriously think Bitcoin would be the end of banks?
10.
by green1 7y ago
The point was about Churchill's popularity in Britain (real vs myth), not the British electoral system.
11.
by green1 7y ago
Yes, without winning the popular vote. From your link: Churchill: 13,717,851 Attlee: 13,948,385
12.
by green1 7y ago
The British don't idealize Churchill, right-wing British and Americans do. He was not even that popular in his finest hour, as head of a cross-party coalition wartime government, being kicked out of office by the British people before
13.
by green1 7y ago
It's a fairly ridiculous scenario in any case. 1. Attacker needs a .gov from a swing state 2. No they don't, because nobody who'd fall for this would analyze the sender address/website URL, let alone for .gov instead of
14.
by green1 7y ago
From that page: > There is no KYC process. How does an unbanked put their paper money into their cryptocurrency account without a KYC process? (Please don't say trust a random third party stranger in a pub offering cryptocurrency at
15.
by green1 7y ago
Ah thanks, I was totally confused by this discussion and curious what it was all about. At first I thought rabidrat was just trolling/joking, but their other comments seemed legit, so wondered if they meant the site in the OP or they h
16.
by green1 7y ago
His about page doesn't 404. Nor does it contain the text you quoted in your previous reply and his main page does not link to /about.html. In fact even if you deliberately add .html to the about page URL it just redirects to &#x2F