grebel

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by grebel 3y ago

   There are non-evidenced beliefs on both sides. The reason you think you are correct is because you assume that your beliefs are facts. Indeed, your comments imply that you are fully immersed in this illusion and are unlikely to accept any s
2. 2.▲
   by grebel 3y ago

   If one scratches the surface of the "saving lives" claim to see what assumptions and beliefs this is based on, it very quickly gets just as crazy as the other side, if not more so.
3. 3.▲
   by grebel 3y ago

   Funnily enough, that's what those on the other side say too. No matter what the topic, those at either end of strongly polarised collections of views do tend to believe that they are correct and everyone else is wrong and informed.
4. 4.▲
   by grebel 3y ago

   That first sentence is quite euphemistic though. There's a lot more to both sides that she quietly implies (by reference to "normal people" finding it "crazy") but doesn't outright mention.
5. 5.▲
   by grebel 3y ago

   > An interesting example is one of her two videos on transgenderism. It had an absolutely appalling both-sidesing intro that literally called people who crazy who are just concerned about suicide rates among trans people. This was what s