graving

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by graving 13y ago

   > proprietary anti-open-source bait. Can you tell me which of the ~1000 VM images they provide as listed in the below site are proprietary? All? None? Some? http://vmdepot.msopentech.com/List/Index Also, Azure charg
2. 2.▲
   by graving 13y ago

   He was a lead on Bing and was working on Windows earlier. That's hardly enterprise.
3. 3.▲
   by graving 13y ago

   Google has OTR on for company IMs. This came out in a court case where IMs were requested as part of discovery.
4. 4.▲
   by graving 13y ago

   This graph[1] tells some of the story, but the bigger story was they failed to capitalize on the patents, and even got fined by a jury for trying to abuse FRAND patents on WiFi and H.264. http://static1.businessinsider.com/i
5. 5.▲
   by graving 13y ago

   They(and you), did hear of the company that originally got these patents. Here's the very interesting story behind the patents. http://techcrunch.com/2012/03/31/why-google-might-be-going-t... edit: I am
6. 6.▲
   by graving 13y ago

   Bing was infringing and Vringo had tens of millions in cash and big investors like Mark Cuban bankrolling it. They certainly didn't need a paltry million bucks to continue the lawsuit. Vringo already had the jury verdict against Googl
7. 7.▲
   by graving 13y ago

   Vringo isn't your average patent troll and actually has a fascinating back story and history behind it. Here's a good link to understand the background. http://techcrunch.com/2012/03/31/why-google-mi