Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
graperapist1480
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
graperapist1480
5y ago
this seems false > May be used to advance CIA goals What does this mean? Can CIA add a voice and video chat feature if the deputy director of it wants it? Can the CIA freely access internal communications? How? Who does this? Does Larry
2.
▲
by
graperapist1480
5y ago
> more accurately that any action taken by the first party might be better viewed as being "really" taken by the second party your comment was basically contradictory. As is this new one - google meet and google duo is a “CIA c
3.
▲
by
graperapist1480
5y ago
> Why should a person's leisure be subject to the whims of employment? Even the leisure time of fish and rabbits are subject to eating leaves and kelp. Time is useful. Your work may give 100x more leisure time to thousands of people
4.
▲
by
graperapist1480
5y ago
every moral imperative is also a personal choice. And honestly, if being a better coder saves 100k people a few hours in wasted time once, that’s ten person years - coming close to moral imperative! If your productivity tool’s new feature e
5.
▲
by
graperapist1480
5y ago
Energy constrained? That’s odd. Just eat more? CICO after all. Maybe guzzle some lard? It’s very dense.
6.
▲
by
graperapist1480
5y ago
so when google releases its 13th chat app, that’s really the CIA doing it? Netflix’s chaos monkey program is ackthuallee an intelligence scam to attack your distributed systems from within?
7.
▲
by
graperapist1480
5y ago
I am secretly controlled by the state because they force me to pay taxes. We are all IRS assets in their quest to build a global American tax-base imperial seat of power.
8.
▲
by
graperapist1480
5y ago
yeah I’d rather hire 7 skilled and well oiled Jews than an “equal opportunity” ratio mixture of 4 whites : 1 black. but there is a “civil rights act” and a lot of creative, anti-hegemonic jurisprudence enduring that my militant ascetic codi
9.
▲
by
graperapist1480
5y ago
you can just sue for discrimination though? That is common. It is considered legally dangerous to have an all white (or, less fantastically, 30% Jew 30% Asian 20% white 0% hispanicblack), but the mode of enforcement would be employment or h
10.
▲
by
graperapist1480
5y ago
realistically, while this may be overstepping the bounds of some faith in fairy tales like “democracy” and “untarnished will of citizens”, this is very very low on the ladder of nasty voting tactics. Compare to gerrymandering, or outright