gr3ml1n

10 ms·

1.
by gr3ml1n 1y ago
or what?
2.
by gr3ml1n 1y ago
It's not a particularly big market, and given the regulatory hurdles: it's simply not worth doing business with the UK for most companies anymore.
3.
by gr3ml1n 1y ago
> they risk sanctions/being arrested when abroad/etc. That's the OP's question. Bluntly: if I'm here, and they're bloviating over there, what can they actually do about it?
4.
by gr3ml1n 1y ago
Not really. It's more like Cloudflare is providing an ipset in your iptables config. It's not Cloudflare's decision: they're just making it easier for you to do it.
5.
by gr3ml1n 1y ago
The counter-argument to this from the AI crowd would be that it's fundamentally impossible for _us_, with our goopy brains, to understand how to do it. Something that is factorial-orders-of-magnitude smarter and faster than us could f
6.
by gr3ml1n 1y ago
Well, first, it would be so far beyond anything we can comprehend as intelligence that even asking that question is considered silly. An ant isn't asking us how we measure the acidity of the atmosphere. It would simply do it via some
7.
by gr3ml1n 1y ago
It starts to veer into sci-fi and I don't personally believe this is practically possible on any relevant timescale, but: The idea is a sufficiently advanced AI could simulate.. everything. You don't need to interact with the phy
8.
by gr3ml1n 1y ago
Isn't the entire EU essentially a panopticon of cameras?
9.
by gr3ml1n 1y ago
Fwiw, Marek's technical corner still exists and still gets some activity.
10.
by gr3ml1n 1y ago
That isn't true. Dedicated bodybuilders, starting more commonly ~5 years ago, decided that PCT wasn't worth it. Instead of typical 16-20 week cycles followed by 4-6 weeks of PCT, they adjust the dose between supraphysiological a
11.
by gr3ml1n 1y ago
Post-cycle therapy will take longer if you're taking exogenous testosterone for longer, but it's definitely not a 'for life'/'impossible' thing if you've been on TRT for a few years and decide to stop
12.
by gr3ml1n 1y ago
What is there to cope about? It's not a big deal, and arguably a benefit.
13.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
Well, definitely don't phrase it exactly like that. Most decisions that would be made in the context where this is a useful technique are irrelevant and/or obvious. They should be made by someone lower down the chain, but organiz
14.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
The suggestion is that negative reviews are suppressed. Communicating a negative review through a facially positive review would help avoid that.
15.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
Re-read the original link, posted again below. The claims you're making are specifically addressed and are wrong. There are multiple critical reviews of this paper. It is well-known to be largely nonsense. http://www.jsmp.
16.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
How long does the checklist need to be? Can I check three boxes if I an interview a gay black jew or do I only get one?
17.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
No, it doesn't. This is a dramatic reach and complete misunderstanding of the stats. The data in table 5 is not statistically significant. If you go down to table 6 (which is also incredibly weak), it shows the opposite: men are adva
18.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
Not really. Everything is downstream of the pressure on organizations to address disparate impact. Some examples: When a company is under pressure to boost the number of X engineers, they quickly run into the 'pipeline problem'.
19.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
> If anything’s really losing credibility right now, it’s the myth of a pure American meritocracy. It only became a myth when we were forced to consider factors beyond merit in hiring.
20.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
I'll try to assume good faith, but this is the sort of framing often used in the waning days of unpopular ideas. That's not what DEI ever was. It fundamentally came down to evaluating disparate impact and then setting targets bas
21.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
SFT can be used to give negative feedback/examples. That's one of the lesser-known benefits/tricks of system messages. E.g: System: You are a helpful chatbot. User: What is 1+1? Assistant: 2. And System: You
22.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
This feels like a category mistake. Why would R1 make RLHF obsolete?
23.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
Your description of distillation is largely correct, but not RLHF. The process of taking a base model that is capable of continuing ('autocomplete') some text input and teaching it to respond to questions in a Q&A chatbot-styl
24.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
I can think of situations where all four make sense. Not sure what you mean? result+no error: data returned, no error happened. - Typical function call where you want some data. no Result+error: nothing to return, error happened. - That ty
25.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
Not surprising at all: Nvidia doesn't want to compete with their own datacenter cards.
26.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
The datacenters I've been in with emergency cooling fans in the walls all exhaust out, not in. Easier to get portable CRACs inside and get a good draft going.
27.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
The higher frequency of launches seems likely to have a big impact on reliability. It's no different than deploying once per day vs once per month. The more you do it, the more edge cases you hit and the more reliable you can make it
28.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
Say you run a small ISP. You pay for (and utilize) a 10Gbps link to the internet from a big ISP: Cogent, maybe. You look at your network traffic and notice 5Gbps of it all seems to be going to a single AS: Google. Your customers just love
29.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
Sending random packets at another AS just results in your traffic being blocked. The network engineers running these systems are smart, and the community is surprisingly small.
30.
by gr3ml1n 2y ago
The rest of the world should simply stop bothering with European silliness tbh.

More ›