gpu_explorer

6 ms·

1.
by gpu_explorer 4y ago
Thanks. I changed the setting, but it didn't help much. It's smart to optimize for small files, since those are probably 99% of your use cases. You might want to remove the part of your web site that says "View Large Files Qu
2.
by gpu_explorer 4y ago
Yes, it's just a .CSV file of a 1920x1080 image. Every value in the .CSV file is 9. 9,9 ... until 1920 columns. ... until 1080 rows.
3.
by gpu_explorer 4y ago
Would you mind explaining the biochemistry of the following statement: "The vaccines however generate large quantities of the more potent Wuhan 2019 spike." Please including at least a few sentences that precisely describe the dif
4.
by gpu_explorer 4y ago
Who is allowed to submit reports to VAERS? How many of the 28,000 reports in VAERS are deaths?
5.
by gpu_explorer 4y ago
Hundreds of thousands of people are dead from vaccine refusal in the US and meanwhile on you talk about an appreciation for science and reason.
6.
by gpu_explorer 4y ago
That is your opinion stated as if it were a fact. Here are facts: Anti-vax is a shortening of the term anti-vaccination, and it is not a surprise to find that people who are 'anti-vax' are against vaccinations, and many of them ac
7.
by gpu_explorer 4y ago
As I posted a few times here in this area so far, vaccine fear isn't rational. It's also amazing to me that so many people who are against vaccines really think that people who are getting vaccinated have been manipulated to do so
8.
by gpu_explorer 4y ago
Vaccines have been in use for hundreds of years. Fear of vaccines isn't rational. https://historyofvaccines.org/
9.
by gpu_explorer 4y ago
Vaccines have been in use for hundreds of years. Fear of vaccines isn't rational. https://historyofvaccines.org/
10.
by gpu_explorer 4y ago
I tried this and it couldn't open a 6MB CSV file with 1920 columns and 1080 rows. Or maybe it could sometime if I decide that I can wait long enough. Notepad++ can open this file almost instantly. Not impressed.
11.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
> Data please? Have you been living under a rock? > There are very intelligent people on HN, but this weird obsession with data and scholarly articles is honestly stupid. We're not talking about events that occurred 100 years ago
12.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
> I'm probably going to get down voted, which only proves my points. It proves precisely none of your points. Data please.
13.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
Kosher rules are against eating pig meat. You can have a pig heart valve or heart, especially to save a life. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikuach_nefesh Not that everyone would do it.
14.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
It's interesting that you raise totalitarians like Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot in this discussion. What are you trying to imply? Implication isn't a sound argument.
15.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
> Social media companies are common carriers, just another set of telecom utilities that must be regulated so they cannot deny users access once they’re above a certain size. In your opinion . There are many good arguments against this
16.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
Here we are talking on HN. Is it okay for HN to ban people who don't follow the rules? I have heard this is something that can happen here. Does this mean HN is preventing people from talking?
17.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
Companies do not have to allow people to use their platforms to engage in antisocial behavior. I'm sorry, but you can't go say whatever you want in the middle of a restaurant and assume that freedom of expression protects you from
18.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
I would remind you that vaccine hesitancy, vaccine skepticism, and vaccine avoidance are not the sole property of the American political right. To this point, Twitter also banned Naomi Wolf. Google it if you're not familiar. Instagram
19.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
I don't think this is the same old tired argument. Political groups are not a protected class in the United States, and for good reason. Political affiliation is not an inherent quality of a person. People's political affiliation
20.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
Where does Twitter's user agreement say "you're not allowed to express any of these opinions"? Otherwise, your argument feels like hyperbole to me.
21.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
Of course. That's why Marjorie Taylor Green shouldn't have breached her user agreement.
22.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
< and then some subgroup I'm going to assume that you have good intent here, but usually "some subgroup" is dog whistle for a repressed group such as persons of color or gay people. I hope that marginalized subgroups conti
23.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
Twitter has the right to freedom of expression and freedom of association, and this gives them the perfect right to ban people from their platform if they don't agree with what people say. Just like you have the right to ask people to
24.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
You mean the "right" to ban Marjorie Taylor Green for breach of contract? Marjorie Taylor Green breached a written agreement she entered into with Twitter. Provided their terms of service aren't illegal, Twitter certainly sho
25.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
> Furthermore, immediately referencing the Bill of Rights to call Twitter's activities "freedom of expression" is wantonly destructive to any sort of discussion. It's absolutely appropriate to reference the Bill of Ri
26.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
> Political fortunes can swing on bad tweets. > Political fortunes can swing on bad press releases. > Political fortunes can swing on bad interviews. > Political fortunes can swing on bad comments at private dinners that become
27.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
Even if we use the definition in sense 2 (and I definitely don't think we should) enforcing a contract is not censorship. As far as I am aware, Marjorie Taylor Green was over the age of majority and of sound mind and body - and therefo
28.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
Humans are a social species, and a lot of what you refer to as "cancel culture" is a reaction to antisocial behavior like racism and sexism and homophobia that actively harms our societies. Some of this behavior has been going on
29.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
It's hard to see this as a "boon" for Marjorie Taylor Green. If Twitter is such a useless platform, why was she busy using it to promote her ideas? I absolutely agree that termination of her Twitter account is not meaningful
30.
by gpu_explorer 5y ago
By this logic, your family is also not a conscious being and cannot experience the subjective feeling of being oppressed. Or maybe you have a girlfriend or a boyfriend and a group of friends. Are these groups also unable to experience the s

More ›