gooosle

6 ms·

1.
by gooosle 1y ago
So... it would be a lot cheaper to just buy all of the books?
2.
by gooosle 1y ago
'sacrifice' what exactly lol? Going the athlete route is generally easier and requires less time investment than going the academic route.
3.
by gooosle 1y ago
> Think about these fantasy sports gambling apps, your coworkers who distract themselves from the drudgery of work by discussing sports, the financial institutions that take a transaction fee from money being passed around, the infinite
4.
by gooosle 1y ago
How dare you steal these hn comments by copying them over to your PC using your browser? Thief!
5.
by gooosle 1y ago
Cool story bud.
6.
by gooosle 1y ago
Russian is a Slavic language and very similar to other Slavic languages especially Ukrainian and Belarusian. Far closer than German and French. I have family across 5 different Slavic countries and hear various Slavic languages regularly. Y
7.
by gooosle 1y ago
It's more like telling a German name from an Austrian name.
8.
by gooosle 1y ago
Gemini 2.5 pro free limit is 100 requests per day. https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits
9.
by gooosle 1y ago
Not at all, there is no resentment - that's your imagination. There is nothing about what I described that indicates that it's a bad work environment - I quite like it. You're bringing up various completely unrelated factors
10.
by gooosle 1y ago
Not at all. What was claimed was that a complete feature was built in record time with AI. What was actually built was a useless and buggy piece of junk that wasted reviewer time and was ultimately thrown out, and it took far longer than cl
11.
by gooosle 1y ago
You planned and wrote a feature yesterday that would have taken yourself 2 whole days? And you already got it reviewed and deployed it and know that 'it works flawlessly'? .... That reminds me of when my manager (a very smart, ver
12.
by gooosle 1y ago
How do you know whether your TLA+ model is accurate?
13.
by gooosle 1y ago
Sure, the 'free speech' propaganda is a conscious part of the (better/more effective) public opinion manipulation playbook.
14.
by gooosle 1y ago
The difference with Russia is that they are much worse at hiding their corruption and censorship.
15.
by gooosle 1y ago
In Canada you can just steal public funds if you're in the government with complete immunity. Set up a government program to support X (ex - greeness, gender education in congo, studying a random worm somewhere in asia, etc), then just
16.
by gooosle 2y ago
Most subreddits tend towards complete bubbles, where anything that goes against the prevailing opinions gets down voted into oblivion or outright deleted by mods.
17.
by gooosle 2y ago
It's funny you say that cause chatgpt, Gemini, etc have way more censorship built in than deepseek.
18.
by gooosle 2y ago
HN ranking algo is suuuusssss
19.
by gooosle 2y ago
No, I wouldn't agree with that at all. Also big difference between saying 'X did this good thing' and 'X did more good than everyone else combined'. And the onus is on you here - you made the absurd claims - now eit
20.
by gooosle 2y ago
I have no way of measuring how much good Bill Gates had done for the world. He has certainly done a lot of evil as well. I literally have have no way of objectively quantifying either, and neither do you, which is why your claims cannot pos
21.
by gooosle 2y ago
The explanation is the entire human race working diligently to produce, create and grow. Not because king Bobbert the 7th gave some artist some money, and not because king Jeffrey got rich by enslaving/conquering/exploring someone
22.
by gooosle 2y ago
You don't seem to understand that your own personal feelings of love towards the 'benevolent billionaire' and their vanity projects do not in any way support your claims. Especially when you're quantifying your claims in
23.
by gooosle 2y ago
Maybe you need to do a quick Google on monetary policy 101 and how money is created. You seem to not understand the basics here. While you're at it, consider what portion of MS success is directly attributable to Bill Gates and not the
24.
by gooosle 2y ago
Now you're playing games around the semantics of the word 'attributable'? Lmao I also love how all of your analogies/examples immediately switched from amazing societal improvements to measurements of physical object cha
25.
by gooosle 2y ago
'gave to the world' implies the world didn't have this money before gates came along. Which is obviously not true and quite literally impossible.
26.
by gooosle 2y ago
It asked for specific metrics backing your claim. Your claim was that tech billionaires contributed more towards the good of society than any other group. You provided a list of metrics that are in no way exclusively attributable to tech bi
27.
by gooosle 2y ago
Where did Bill Gates get these billions that he 'gave to the world' ? Did he generate them purely from his genius and benevolence?
28.
by gooosle 2y ago
It doesn't contain anything that would either back or excuse your claims.
29.
by gooosle 2y ago
'proposed metrics'? LOL Is that a way of saying 'I don't actually have any data or numbers backing my absurd claims'?
30.
by gooosle 2y ago
You can't make a case for any of that. But go ahead and try.

More ›