goatydev

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by goatydev 14d ago

   I used 1.2 for free for a while, and it was a pretty good experience. 1.3 would also be worth using, provided the price is reasonable.
2. 2.▲
   by goatydev 15d ago

   To be honest, I haven't used it. I didn't want to install an app. I’d recommend launching a web version quickly. The biggest barrier to this service is likely the fact that it requires installation.
3. 3.▲
   by goatydev 16d ago

   It feels like a "TikTok-ified" version of a directory site. Since it’s a novel concept, I think it could attract a significant number of users—provided it’s fun and goes viral.
4. 4.▲
   by goatydev 16d ago

   That seems like a fairly novel idea. I’m not sure if it uses AI or OCR to analyze the images, but the external recording of sensitive information—such as that found in PDFs—could raise privacy concerns. It will be important to address these
5. 5.▲
   by goatydev 20d ago

   If there weren't any privacy issues, I'd love to have one just as a toy.
6. 6.▲
   by goatydev 24d ago

   I tried to create a similar site myself a while back, but the biggest challenge was that the margin of error was just too wide. I checked various benchmarks for different GPUs, but there were cases where the results differed, and there were
7. 7.▲
   by goatydev 24d ago

   It's a bit difficult to use, but it's really fun.