gnull

6 ms·

1.
by gnull 1mo ago
It also even easier to get working and integrate into your system in a sustainable manner with NixOS. Do it by hand or throw an LLM at it, it will get you a declarative patch for your NixOS config that brings llama-cpp into your config that
2.
by gnull 1mo ago
What concrete arguments are there to believe in your talent hypothesis instead of their tool hypothesis? A couple more comments like this from you, and I'll be able to say, "cyanmoonx has a history of blaming the talent rather tha
3.
by gnull 1mo ago
Claude code is just pool quality. They don't make how this thing will behave clear to the user, or give control. They fail at anything that needs an abstraction or model, not just APIs and shell scripts glued together. And "just a
4.
by gnull 2mo ago
What is a "document editor"? I edit my documents in Kakoune, and send a PDF. Where is that history supposed to be? About your actual point: can you also make AI actually say things and have something to say, and not just try to im
5.
by gnull 2mo ago
> So is for Go developers who want systems-level control without learning a new language. And for C programmers who like Go's safety, structure, and tooling. Wut? Also, how do you preserve garbage collector semantics without garbage
6.
by gnull 2mo ago
What was your methodology and structure in making the prompts for the rewrite? Did you let the LLM roam in all of the codebase and tests from the beginning, or revealed things to it gradually in some way?
7.
by gnull 2mo ago
Regression tests start to play a different role with LLMs. On one hand, they give an LLM a short feedback loop to correct itself, and iterate fast when writing code. A human also uses it as a feedback loop, but we don't iterate as fast
8.
by gnull 6mo ago
Packaging for nix is exceptionally easy once you learn it. And once something is packaged, it's solved for all, it's not going to randomly break. If you care about getting it to work with minimal effort right now more thar about i
9.
by gnull 7mo ago
I agree about democracy. What I was referring to is that part of the society didn't roll with the legitimate leader's decision not to align with EU in 2013. And it was undemocratic. I stressed that it was split, and the democratic
10.
by gnull 7mo ago
Are there any key details you're leaving out? Is there a chance you creatively picked what to leave out in a way that serves the view you're sympathetic to?
11.
by gnull 7mo ago
Is this trolling by stupidity? You are irredeemable. I wasn't talking about elections, I meant everything before it that caused premature elections in 2014. Was there something major that happened in 2013-2014 involving violence that i
12.
by gnull 7mo ago
Sure. And you keep babbling and restating your point instead of proving it because you've got an overwhelming proof, you're just too polite to share it with us.
13.
by gnull 7mo ago
Oh sure, I can believe that. It still seems to me like a sign of Georgia's economy strengthening. Many people with buying capabilities which actually settle, not just come occasionally for cheap stuff. (Looking at the thread's con
14.
by gnull 7mo ago
What did the ratio of European tourists to Russian look like? Not sure what grab of power you're referring to. The inflow of Russians was a boost for Georgia. These are whole IT companies that moved with workers, high-paying jobs and t
15.
by gnull 7mo ago
I do believe that the discussion of good and evil is a meaningful one, but it's nuanced and we must be extremely careful with definitions and not to confuse ethics debate with irrational emotions. If someone points a gun at me, I give
16.
by gnull 7mo ago
> Also it's a rather small economy producing largely low value products despite vast natural resources - there's no benefit in associating with them in this day and age. The cheap gas is not worth it. Why it's not worth it
17.
by gnull 7mo ago
If it's that simple, why doesn't everyone "want in" and get those precious living standards? There must be a lot of stupid governments if they literally refuse free stuff. Or your statement is naive and overly simplistic
18.
by gnull 7mo ago
I don't like using "western-oriented" as synonym for free/democratic/good, but otherwise I agree it's gotten worse. Your use of the word "backsliding", I think, was appropriate. Are we talking about E
19.
by gnull 7mo ago
Not sure where you got that. Sounds like trying to use tropes from a superficial Hollywood action movie in real life, not my thing. I think that a Ukrainian in his sane mind would want to look at options he's dealt and pick the one tha
20.
by gnull 7mo ago
Fair point, I agree I made it too arrogant. We all have things we misuse, but I think those things may characterize us sometimes. For example, in Russian we often misuse the word Hindu to mean Indian. It may mean that the person is uneducat
21.
by gnull 7mo ago
I doubt they will benefit from that integration much. But I'm pretty sure the way there will hurt. Georgia's economy is tied to Russia at the moment, and as you said Westerners are not exactly lining up to travel to Georgia and or
22.
by gnull 8mo ago
I see, you are more focused on providing the core functionality in the simplest way possible from purely technical perspective, and less so on what kind of "language" or interface it provides the end user — assuming someone who wa
23.
by gnull 8mo ago
Haha, you got me again! I honestly tried putting yours into a table and couldn't in a way that makes it look defensible. About 2025: I generally find a bit of cheeky tone appropriate for a dramatic effect, apologies if I offended you.
24.
by gnull 8mo ago
You got me, it doesn't have arguments. Luckily, my argument did not critically rely on this bit, and it's still valid. Instead of occasional disconnected thoughts and vulgar attempts to insult, try to construct a complete, coheren
25.
by gnull 8mo ago
Make a named pipe then. Shells have built-in primitives for that. I.e. <() and >() subshells in bash, or psub in fish. Or have an option to read either a file descriptor or a file. I can't understand why you keep inflating the di
26.
by gnull 8mo ago
It's 2025, dude. You can't be seriously telling me how difficult it is to parse arguments. It may be difficult in C, but then we're down another sick rabbit hole of justifying bad interface with bad language choice. One open
27.
by gnull 9mo ago
Those descriptors like 5 could be mapped to anything, including descriptor 1, stdout.
28.
by gnull 9mo ago
That's such a user-hostile design decision. I can't fathom what justifies it (other than kinky taste). Makes your commands unreadable without a manual, leaves a lot of room for errors that are quietly ignored. And forces you into
29.
by gnull 9mo ago
It's not just encouraging, it's almost making it a necessity. Putting aside one's respect for law may be a matter of responsibility when your competitors are gaining advantage by not playing by the rules.
30.
by gnull 9mo ago
The reasons for doing something and public justification, aka casus belli, are different things. Casus belli makes it cheaper to execute, but reasons are what actually drives them. The clowns and the reasons that drive them are the same for

More ›