gnaritas99

7 ms·

1.
by gnaritas99 3y ago
You are simply incorrect. They can reason.
2.
by gnaritas99 3y ago
Humans come on pre-trained hardware. An LLM embodied with senses would have all the data it ever needs starting from a similar pre-training.
3.
by gnaritas99 3y ago
You're the one not realizing, it's that final belief that makes it a religion, that other shit you mention isn't religion, it's just world view and lifestyle neither of which are traits unique to religion. "How to l
4.
by gnaritas99 4y ago
No, having a special way to tail your special log file isn't a feature, tail is a general utility used system wide for this for decades; breaking this is idiotic no matter what you grew up with.
5.
by gnaritas99 4y ago
"If scaled up" presumes incorrectly that the costs are somehow linearly bound to the number of transactions, they are not, so that whole line of reasoning is flawed.
6.
by gnaritas99 4y ago
That's rather the point; tech breakthroughs happen when there is a drive to achieve something, increased demand for solar causes that pressure to strive and thus increases the likelihood of innovation. The more panels that are built, t
7.
by gnaritas99 4y ago
Oh, terminal, yea that's one where I agree, they want company more than anything; but even that will eventually fall prey to AGI. People will be best friends and family with AGI's; grow up with them, presuming we don't go dow
8.
by gnaritas99 4y ago
Hugs would have been a great example, human contact is the point; not true with massage, not unless you're being creepy. They're there for your muscles, not to turn you on and fill some emotional need.
9.
by gnaritas99 4y ago
Neither of those examples are a good illustration of your point as many and probably most will prefer the machine in both scenarios. I don't get a massage for an emotional experience with the masseuse; I'd prefer the likely much c
10.
by gnaritas99 4y ago
All court activism is corruption; their job is not to make law or have political opinions of any sort, they should be slaves to the text of the law, not bending it to their will.
11.
by gnaritas99 4y ago
If you want the people who make the rules we must live by to be constrained by the median salary, then you're begging for them to be utterly incompetent people as anyone competent will not take such a low paying job when they can easil
12.
by gnaritas99 4y ago
It might suit them, but it doesn't suit us. The desire for public service is in no way a qualifier for competence.
13.
by gnaritas99 4y ago
If you don't pay as well as the market pays, you're not going to get competent people. This notion that good people would do it anyway is naive.
14.
by gnaritas99 4y ago
> On average in a free market those with more resources are better organized and know what’s best for the country. No, they don't, and there's not a rational or logical reason to infer they do.