Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
glassounds
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
Researchers find the gas pedal and brake for anxiety, and they aren't neurons
(psypost.org)
15 points
by
glassounds
10mo ago
|
1 comments
2.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
They're using the current common terminology for the phenomenon, which does not have the roots you claimed it has.
3.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
I can promise you that "the ADL and Israel and the Zionist institutions" are not the only ones using the term "antisemitism". I'd personally prefer that it'd be called anti Jewish racism.
4.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
[flagged]
5.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
Regardless of whether a group of politicians use it maliciously or not - Antisemitism exists and happens all the time. It has not "lost its value", and if it has then so has western society.
6.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
The word has never, in its history, been used for anything other than racism against Jews. There are Semitic languages, not people. > Due to the root word Semite, the term is prone to being invoked as a misnomer by those who incorrectly
7.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
> I don't remember using it at all, unless you mean where I asked you what "artificial" adds to the term. What are you referring to here, exactly? I mistook you for another commenter. What's your end goal here? You&#x
8.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
By the way artificial diamonds and synthetic diamonds are the exact same thing: > A synthetic diamond or laboratory-grown diamond (LGD), also called a lab-grown diamond, laboratory-created, man-made, artisan-created, artificial, syntheti
9.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
> made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally, especially as a copy of something natural. Artificial is an adjective here, as in a type of intelligence that is artificial. It's not exactly the same, it's a
10.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
In your opinion do people mean the same thing when discussing enemy AI in a game engine and LLMs / AGI?
11.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
It's not measurable externally perhaps if the mechanism sufficiently mimics intelligence, but I'd argue that to do that the mechanism actually needs to answer at least some of the criteria above. It's also not necessarily som
12.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
I don't understand the question, the comment above asked for a possible definition of an artificial intelligence. An artificial intelligence is an intelligence. I'd assumed "and not natural / created" was a given Ed
13.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
My point is that when people say AGI they don't mean a super sophisticated version of a game engine's enemy behavioral mechanics. Sci-fi is many times a speculative guess about the possible future of technology, IMO its not comple
14.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
I've touched on that in this and another comment, but my main point is that intelligence involves actual understanding rather than association or statistical analysis between input and output. Anything that we define as truly intellige
15.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
You've made that point three times now, I understand your disagreement and have addressed it
16.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
See my comment above to the original statement
17.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
That's not the usage I'm familiar with, e.g. sci-fi novels will frequently use AI for actually intelligent and possibly sentient beings that just aren't biological (see Skippy in Expeditionary Force), the intelligence isn
18.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
While I agree with the sentiment (this was the case for machine learning before as well), calling it autocomplete is probably an overcorrection since its usefulness as a tool extends beyond that (e.g. summarizing). LLM bubble?
19.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
I've touched on this in the sibling comment but this does raise the question of what's the difference between an artificial intelligence and an artificial sentience / consciousness. There's some overlap in our current pe
20.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
I'd argue that LLMs don't have intelligence, they have the ability to match a correct response to a prompt but that's not a product of any internal process that's like what we call intelligence (unless that's used t
21.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
I'm sure a better philosophical definition exists but off the top of my head: An intelligence should be able to actually understand its input / output (rather than appear to understand), be able to reason about itself recursively*
22.
▲
by
glassounds
2y ago
That's part of the problem though: It's not an intelligence, artificial or otherwise, yet we still call it "AI", giving people the impression that LLMs are almost AGI or a step on the way while a true artificial intellig
23.
▲
by
glassounds
3y ago
Zellij perhaps?
24.
▲
August - An Emmet-like language that produces JSON, TOML, or YAML
(github.com)
2 points
by
glassounds
3y ago
|
0 comments
25.
▲
Melody 0.19.0 – A language that compiles to regular expressions
(github.com)
3 points
by
glassounds
3y ago
|
1 comments
26.
▲
by
glassounds
5y ago
privacytools.io is also a good source
27.
▲
by
glassounds
5y ago
Babel doesn't necessarily need to transpile all the way to ES5, you can specify targets. It's a useful tool for using newer features even without supporting IE
28.
▲
by
glassounds
6y ago
Not saying this is "bad", but why not use a module for that?
29.
▲
by
glassounds
7y ago
https://birdeatsbug.com is great for that kind of thing