Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gjuggler
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
Find Your Erdős Number
(underleaf.ai)
4 points
by
gjuggler
2mo ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
by
gjuggler
3mo ago
The most interesting thing here is that Claude Science runs a local server and a web-based UI that connects to that server from your browser. This is very different from Claude Code and Cowork, where the UI is more tightly coupled to the ho
3.
▲
New arXiv policy: 1-year ban for hallucinated references
(twitter.com)
659 points
by
gjuggler
4mo ago
|
230 comments
4.
▲
Fabricated citations: an audit across 2·5M biomedical papers
(thelancet.com)
1 points
by
gjuggler
4mo ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
gjuggler
5mo ago
Thanks for sharing your process! It's helpful and refreshing to hear from someone about how they engage with AI when writing, and where / when the detection tools may fail. (We obviously live in a more nuanced world than most soci
6.
▲
by
gjuggler
5mo ago
I was surprised not to see any discussion on whether the author used AI to help write this post. As many people say, writing is thinking. I started getting that "I'm reading another AI-written blog post" feeling around 1/
7.
▲
by
gjuggler
9mo ago
I think Gemini is just broken. Instead of forwarding model-generated links to https://www.google.com/url?q=[URL] , which serves the purpose of malware check and user-facing warning about linking to an external site, Gemini f
8.
▲
A $650M Donation for Psychiatric Research
(nytimes.com)
104 points
by
gjuggler
12y ago
|
38 comments
9.
▲
A true transitional open-access business model
(blogs.law.harvard.edu)
1 points
by
gjuggler
12y ago
|
0 comments
10.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
It's important to recognize that PLOS' new data sharing policy is only about data directly tied to the publication of a traditional journal article. So while PLOS authors are being forced to share their data, it's only done
11.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
While this problem may be true of certain poor actors in some fields of science, I would argue that it's far more the exception than the rule. My experience (in genomics / evolutionary genetics) was overwhelmingly positive, with h
12.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
This is a very cool technical integration between two services that are — or should be — used by most scientists working in code. But what exactly is the "problem" of citation of code that this solution fixes? Let's say you r
13.
▲
In conversation with... Steven Pinker
(mosaicscience.com)
1 points
by
gjuggler
13y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
This is a really thoughtful post highlighting many of the deeply-rooted problems in securing funding as an early-stage academic. It's depressing for bright young scientists to be looking forward to lives as assistant professors submitt
15.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
Really cool to see this! I'm sure the effort required to make it open source will pay off in fostering an active technical community. Given the target market I'm sure you have many highly skilled users who would love (at the very
16.
▲
Convert any Google Doc to Markdown by pasting its URL
(script.google.com)
2 points
by
gjuggler
13y ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
Really? As far as I can tell extensions like Evernote (3.2m users), Pocket (1.5m) and Buffer (250k) are heavily used, well understood, and loved by many average consumers. You could make the argument that the variety of use cases is limited
18.
▲
Walking through a Digital Memorial: the #pdftribute PDFs
(blog.paperpile.com)
1 points
by
gjuggler
13y ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
No, I didn't intend the irony — I didn't know it was common for employers to formally request that salaries be kept confidential. However, even if intra-company sharing is discouraged / disallowed, it is still common for jo
20.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
These clauses are aggressively anti-librarian, and unfortunately librarians don't have a choice but to subscribe at whatever price. Academic papers don't exist in a competitive marketplace; once a non-open access paper is publishe
21.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
There's nothing controversial here — Elsevier merely bumped up the rate at which they're sending Academia.edu takedown notices for obvious infringement by its users. What's more interesting to me is that ResearchGate, a site
22.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
Re: PDF / attachment handling, you may be interested in what Paperpile ( http://paperpile.com ) does with PDFs: we create a subfolder in your Google Drive space which automatically stays synced with your reference library, so
23.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
A large chunk of ORCID actually is open source: https://github.com/ORCID/ORCID-Source (though I don't necessarily agree that it should be, since ORCID is not a library or tool, but rather a service that only has
24.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
Have you tried actually logging in? This is not quite arxiv.org — I'd estimate that 90% of the engineering going into academia.edu has gone towards features on par with LinkedIn for their spamminess. I signed up, and was asked about 10
25.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
Have you seen eLife's Lens reader? Example article is at http://lens.elifesciences.org/#00772 They took a fresh, web-centric look at how to interactively display research papers. It's being used — right now — to d
26.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
A great example of a web-friendly, interactive view of a scientific paper is the eLife Lens, example here: http://lens.elifesciences.org/#00380 . They announced the open source project back in June (blog post http:/&#
27.
▲
by
gjuggler
13y ago
Using straight console.log statements seems to be non-negotiable for effective debugging, at least until a good workaround for the above is found. For using Chrome's logging styles, we define a few short helper functions — l1(), l2(), l3(),
28.
▲
by
gjuggler
14y ago
There's an associated website at http://birdtree.org/ . They don't seem to be providing the actual phylogenetic tree data (there's a cryptic note "More information will be made available here with the print publication of the study"), but
29.
▲
by
gjuggler
15y ago
I think the logo clicking decision isn't crazy. My interpretation is that Google is "un-training" users from using this valuable piece of screen real estate for a useless no-op function, in anticipation of putting a more useful function in
30.
▲
by
gjuggler
15y ago
One of my greatest regrets from undergrad days was having graduated a year too early to enroll in this course. Scott Strobel was something of a visionary for setting it up, and it seems to have paid off with at least one cool result -- not
More ›