gip

8 ms·

1.
by gip 22d ago
My toddler gets a book a month in the mail from Dolly's Imagination Library and we keep reading some almost every day. She's made an impact in so many families <3
2.
by gip 28d ago
Just tried and although it’s not that polished or fast imo it’s very cool. GLM 5.2 totally free even with a free Vercel account. Make business sense too - fx is the entry point to bring more user to Vercel AI.
3.
by gip 1mo ago
Not sure as OpenAI models (Sol, Luna,..) are also discounted on the Vercel AI Gateway rn. My bet is on OpenAI trying to drive more enterprise customers to their models through API.
4.
by gip 1mo ago
I’m impressed by tinygrad. Full-featured deep-learning framework with ZERO dependencies, fully hackable, and orders of magnitude fewer LoC than PyTorch. Want to run Qwen3.8 27B? Download the quantized model from HF, git clone tinygrad, then
5.
by gip 1mo ago
The real target for Anthropic, OpenAI and tons of others are large enterprises and workflows. I think they will do all right if they execute well.
6.
by gip 4mo ago
Yes and this is in line with the idea that 99%+ of the value created by AI will be captured by the broader economy, not OpenAI and friends. That being said, even local AI will still be displacing humans fast and it's not clear new jobs
7.
by gip 4mo ago
That makes sense, thank you for explaining. TradFi already offer access (direct or ETFs) to major cryptos who have demonstrated some utility like BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL and a few others. If interest in tokens and altcoins wanes, Coinbase may be
8.
by gip 4mo ago
Very curious why they haven’t diversified into real world assets. It seems like an obvious move, even if the margins would be lower than their fee business (~85% margins!!). They’ve added tokens and altcoins to the platform, but I don’t thi
9.
by gip 5mo ago
> We need to heavily regulate anybody who is not following the rules that make us the de-facto winner How about building a multipolar world where different parts of the world (US/China/India/EU/Africa,..) get to build
10.
by gip 5mo ago
Same with Codex and very soon with open source & local models. Training great models (for coding and similar tasks) seems to be a question of scale and not much more. It is likely that 99% of the value created by Anthropic / OpenAI
11.
by gip 5mo ago
True. That is why it is key important to have open source and sovereign models that will be accessible to all and always on / local. Competition (OpenAI vs Anthropic is fun to watch) and open source will get us there soon I think.
12.
by gip 5mo ago
Totally. That is why it is key important to have open source and sovereign models that will be accessible to all and always. At the end of the day, all these closed models are being built by companies that pumped all the knowledge from the
13.
by gip 5mo ago
I have been told by a startup founder that he wants his strongest player to replace and automate the weakest using AI! That may be what Meta is already doing. I’m afraid we are going to see something like that at play in tech for the coming
14.
by gip 5mo ago
It could be an A/B test to see whether people without an existing subscription care about Claude Code (CC) at all. If they sign up then CC is disabled (or not as it is not really an issue to offer more). Capturing that info would defin
15.
by gip 5mo ago
For a successful IPO and attract more capital you need a very good story/narrative. That what is being crafted here. Business fundamentals matter less with elon!
16.
by gip 5mo ago
Taking dystopia aside, without a lot more context I don't quite get how the captured data will be particularly useful to train models for say software engineering. If someone can shed light - thanks!
17.
by gip 5mo ago
> because some other parents won’t activate it, which then makes the situation unfair for the kids. I’d much rather have it on by default so that all kids are treated the same. That’s a strange argument. The government or anyone doesn’t
18.
by gip 6mo ago
Surprised by this take. Building a startup is already insanely hard. So I wouldn’t like to add more challenge by spending time integrating with non-US services if they are not top just because of my political views. I feel a better answer
19.
by gip 6mo ago
I agree with the risk you’re pointing to. Money currently mediates access to resources through labor and markets. We either need to redesign money or a novel way to mediate access to resources. I haven't seen any proposal to make that
20.
by gip 6mo ago
> There must be a lot of pride and meaning in being run over by Saleforce's money truck. They probably don't have much choice and Salesfore needs people who have built and launched products (I don't have any info, just a g
21.
by gip 7mo ago
Assuming: simplicity === no unnecessary complexity. In my (limited) experience as an engineer and manager, leadership (e.g., a VP) didn’t like (or reward) simplicity. Simple solutions often meant smaller teams, which wasn’t something they w
22.
by gip 7mo ago
Or worse: train the AI to make decisions that align with the view of Anthropic management and not the elected government. Workout telling anyone. I’d agree it is a serious risk.
23.
by gip 7mo ago
The challenge for Americans is: can the political work of defining and protecting our values be outsourced to a company like Anthropic? Anthropic (and others), whether due to financial/regulatory/competitive, will at some point pe
24.
by gip 7mo ago
The reality is that the US Constitution only offers strong guarantees to citizens and (some of) the people in the US. Foreigners are excluded and foreign mass surveillance is or will happen. I believe every country (or block) should carve a
25.
by gip 7mo ago
AI is a transformative technology that will reshape how companies are run. More layoffs may be coming unfortunately. But on the other end, more companies and more products will be created. More competition overall, including for Block. The
26.
by gip 7mo ago
That would require to repeal the FISA and the Patriot acts. That won't happen. More fundamentally, however, the US constitution only protects Americans and American companies. Europeans would be foolish to trust the US with their data
27.
by gip 7mo ago
Similarly, in the 2000s, the US pushed back against the development of Galileo and preferred that Europe continue relying on GPS. That created tensions between the US and the EU. Fighting data sovereignty is a losing battle for the US: data
28.
by gip 7mo ago
My prediction: soon (e.g. a few years) the agents will be the one doing the exploration and building better ways to write code, build frameworks,... replacing open source. That being said software engineers will still be in the loop. But th
29.
by gip 7mo ago
I think that’s fair.. building a competing product would likely be relatively easy and inexpensive. But that’s true for most software now: it’s becoming easier to build, and the barriers to entry are lower. I love Anthropic and OpenAI equal
30.
by gip 7mo ago
Send an DM on twitter to @edfixyz (one of my account) and I'll reply with a link to the website tomorrow to give you a sense. Can't share a link here, it will kill my backend.

More ›