gigitrix

7 ms·

1.
by gigitrix 4y ago
Urgency should be directed at the process which is providing that advance and rightly demanding the amount to sufficient and the release quick for the reasons you specify. Instead they are off on their own demanding bailouts and rejecting e
2.
by gigitrix 4y ago
They are doing exactly what they should be doing to minimise impact while letting markets be markets, VCs are just too busy making a big mess in their underpants and screaming about why they should be special-cased to read the details
3.
by gigitrix 4y ago
You don't accept it, you deal with the regulators and FDIC and demand they release liquidity as soon as possible, which they are striving to do.
4.
by gigitrix 4y ago
They have been pretty clear that they want to do this. And the balance sheet as liquidity skewed as it is is healthy, I would be extremely surprised if they get less than 95% back. These "movements" are folks asking for normal pro
5.
by gigitrix 14y ago
There is of course hype but the past few months do represent real growth: see [here]( http://blockchain.info/charts/n-unique-addresses ). Now obviously that's a very gameable graph but there is little incentive to do so (and I was trying to
6.
by gigitrix 14y ago
It's too late for an "alternative" now. Regardless of your views on the impact of deflation in an overall society, a deflationary currency is always going to be a better store of value and a more attractive option for a consumer. The wheels
7.
by gigitrix 14y ago
It's not a "feeling" when all evidence points to the fact that, like every security vulnerability ever, a feature was added that had unintended consequences. There's no way it's malicious: Ubisoft can't do anything with this that they can't
8.
by gigitrix 14y ago
Just because someone points out a problem doesn't mean the onus is on them to find the perfect solution.