ghjv

5 ms·

1.
by ghjv 14d ago
Thanks for sharing this essay, can you share the prompt you used to generate it as well?
2.
by ghjv 1mo ago
looks fine on my machine
3.
by ghjv 2mo ago
interested in reading this but the tone is so sour and sneering that I couldn't get through the first section.
4.
by ghjv 3mo ago
It's 100% AI Generated, stick it in Pangram yourself and see.
5.
by ghjv 4mo ago
While reading some of the comments on this thread I felt somewhat troubled at how pessimistic a few users were about having meaningful relationships with other people. Can be easy to feel like what you read on Social Media is representative
6.
by ghjv 6mo ago
Isaac Asimov has been dead for 34 years. How long should we wait to name something after someone? Not rhetorical, interested in more detail about when the odiousness crosses into being socially acceptable for you.
7.
by ghjv 6mo ago
Out of curiosity - were this and other comments from this account written by hand, or generated and posted by an agent on behalf of a human user?
8.
by ghjv 7mo ago
this seems like an unreasonably unchartiable reading of a relatively chill and nice situation
9.
by ghjv 8mo ago
I never spoke to the man, but reading the oodles and oodles of words he put out for the public over the years gives me the impression that he would find something like this mostly neat and worthwhile while still being a bit disquieting and
10.
by ghjv 8mo ago
—It's not X, it's Y?
11.
by ghjv 9mo ago
My question was from the context of non-research staff looking to provide financial and institutional support to research staff - looks like your resource is useful for researchers but not for me. thanks in any case.
12.
by ghjv 9mo ago
Elaborate?
13.
by ghjv 9mo ago
reducing wasteful government spending is an admirable goal but DOGE seems in mine and many others estimation to have focused less on reducing wasteful spending (overpaying for simple services, unnecessary doublings of effort, overly complex
14.
by ghjv 9mo ago
It's certainly on the table, I'm only pre-empting it as a clever answer since it's one I'm already aware of.
15.
by ghjv 9mo ago
How should one orient themselves and their career if they wanted to work to increase funding to scientific development? Outside the obvious "make a boatload of money doing something obscenely profitable and distribute the money yoursel
16.
by ghjv 9mo ago
thought you were being flip or assuming that, but checked their profile and you are right. I agree that this should be disclosed in their comment.
17.
by ghjv 9mo ago
Steam's lawyers would say that one should know by reading the terms of service for the storefront and the purchase. But in the real world, how often does that happen?
18.
by ghjv 9mo ago
regardless of the resolution of Paris' case, at this point I doubt sincerely I will ever willingly purchase an Apple gift card. To be frank, most gift cards are persona non grata for myself and ~all discerning consumers I know
19.
by ghjv 9mo ago
habitually move my cursor while reading things... so Feels Bad for sure
20.
by ghjv 9mo ago
anyone able to ping this to the lads at the National Design Studio?
21.
by ghjv 11mo ago
strange to talk about it in the future tense. it's here and yep, it's an object of fascination for the legal system
22.
by ghjv 11mo ago
Makes sense, I guess. Did you hear that question yourself in an interview, hear it from someone who interviewed, or hear that as a story through the grapevine? and ~when was it asked?
23.
by ghjv 11mo ago
this would be admirable if it's done in earnest to try and increase accessibility, but you say explicitly it's done specifically to "pour sand in the gears". please don't
24.
by ghjv 1y ago
wouldn't your finger have acted as a heat sink, lowering the temp? sounds like the program may have worked correctly. could be worth trying again with a hot enough piece of metal instead of your finger