Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
georgiapeach
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
Good luck getting traction. The web is littered with the corpses of "comment on any website" apps. The problem is that there are too many websites and too many incompatible "comment on any website" standards for any one
2.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
Self deprecation can be a disarming marketing strategy, but only when combined with humor to make it palatable. Your self deprecation is coming across as all negative here, and there's no humorous payoff. Recalibrate your tone.
3.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
Rubber gloves.
4.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
> They don't have that ability; Yes, they do. What stops private parties from colluding? Nothing. What stops your local ISP (in most locations, in a position of local monopoly) from denying you access, even without participation fro
5.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
It does. Taunting has been a time-honored male behavior for thousands of years. Women have been privy to it only very recently.
6.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
You're trying to police ideas and behaviors that offend you. You don't have the right to do that. That's unacceptable. Police your own, instead.
7.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
We are talking about the exact same thing and you keep trying to evade the question. How would you feel if websites colluded to prevent you from communicating at all, based on what they consider to be undesirable, not based on what you
8.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
Punishments are about a combination of rehabilitation, disincentivization and reducing or eliminating harm to society at large. In cases of capital punishment, the chances of rehabilitation is considered to be effectively zero, so the other
9.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
> It's hard to say considering that has happened to a total of 0 people ever. It's what you're proposing to do to other people, so you have the ethical burden of considering how you'd feel if it were done to you. So h
10.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
Punitive measures aren't about revenge,
11.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
You don't even need to go incognito. There are extensions available for every major browser that will let you set detailed cookie policies, such as wiping per-domain cookies once every x hours or x days. This can be set up once, and th
12.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
A configuration for cheap VPS providers who provide a limited range of ports on one IPv4 address (plus one or more IPv6 addresses) would be great. See: http://lowendspirit.com/ https://definedcodehosting.com/
13.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
There is no difference whatsoever. All your censored communications would be attempted -- and rejected -- through private websites, too. So how would you feel about it? How would you feel about the oppression you're looking to subject
14.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
I don't understand why any form of execution -- lethal injection, firing squad, guillotine, or any other -- isn't preceded by a hearty dose of morphine.
15.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
One example is not a long history, and evidence not properly investigated by law enforcement is not legally admissible -- or credible -- evidence. Doesn't it seem odd to you that not a single one of these shrill feminists complaining a
16.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
How would you feel if a government agency or ISP or some other adversary used such technology to censor all your online communications -- so you couldn't ever contact anyone, through any protocol -- because it considered you to be unde
17.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
China has developed a lot of technology and expends a lot of man hours to censoring what it considers to be offensive opinions, and yet, every day, people find new and interesting ways to express those same offensive opinions. It's as
18.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
It's the waste of a good engineering/programming brain on management. That's what he said. You are twisting his words because you have no legitimate argument.
19.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
The volume is most certainly not the same. Men taunt each other a lot more, and far more colorfully. As for the impact, if it's not the same, it's simply because men are more mature, and women have a lot of growing up to do.
20.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
> Insults as a form of threat to one's health, in the form of pushing someone toward suicide. This is not a threat. Good luck getting it prosecuted as one. > Rape threats are insults. This is not an insult. Good luck getting it p
21.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
Yo, dude, it's not cool to use the fringe behavior of a few individuals as leverage to baselessly and hatefully defame and entire gender. You need to cut that shit out, and you need to cut it out right fucking now.
22.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
It's shameless, toxic, misandric bullshit pretending to be tech news. It's not. It's gender shaming/policing black propaganda.
23.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
Great. If you truly believe that human thought and behavior can be changed, go ahead and change your own. Stop getting offended by trivial things. You're the problem, so stop being a problem.
24.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
Anyone should feel uncomfortable making up unsubstantiated bullshit to push a toxic, hateful, misandric agenda.
25.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
> Rape threats are significantly worse than death threats, That is such unadulterated bullshit. Would you rather be raped or killed? Quick! Choose one! Exactly.
26.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
> It's about how it is different from what men get and about how it is more than what men get. It's about that, but it doesn't prove that. Not at all. Not one bit. Four anecdotes aren't proof of anything. Come back wi
27.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
How would you feel if a government agency or ISP or some other adversary used such technology to censor all your online communications -- so you couldn't ever contact anyone, through any protocol -- because it considered you to be unde
28.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
How does that answer the objection I raised? It doesn't. It's pure ad hominem. And for that, you lose by default. Thanks for your time, anyway.
29.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
> based on nothing more than a joke None of your examples demonstrate this. The joke is always a footnote to some other, primary complaint. You failed your burden of proof.
30.
▲
by
georgiapeach
12y ago
You just spent a few paragraphs breathlessly and remorselessly gender shaming heterosexual men. How do you feel about that?
More ›