genidoi

4 ms·

1.
by genidoi 3d ago
It’s obviously not about the cost of the parts, there just can’t be any tolerance for criminal conduct in government agency employees.
2.
by genidoi 5d ago
> RSI is obviously There is no publicly known reference example of RSI, we have no idea how it works or what it does to the trajectory of progress?
3.
by genidoi 5d ago
No it’s not the same thing because one serves food, and the other facilitated academic fraud.
4.
by genidoi 13d ago
That approach doesn’t scale though.
5.
by genidoi 14d ago
Good code reliably transforms real world state in a desirable way.
6.
by genidoi 27d ago
It's probably quite difficult to manipulate per-user metrics after the data is collected.
7.
by genidoi 2mo ago
Why would they have more spare capacity than Anthropic? Do you have a source for that?
8.
by genidoi 2mo ago
It's frustrating when I catch it doing this because it's wasting tokens and time on what it reports as "one-off" scripts. Might add a requirement to never use shell scripting unless the task is truly a one liner.
9.
by genidoi 2mo ago
I find LLM's too fall into the trap of writing a bash script for a task that clearly needs to be implemented in an Actual Language with Real Data Structures. For example, ask an LLM to bring up a SQL server with some schema + data prel
10.
by genidoi 2mo ago
> you can use AI to understand something and map it to your own mental map This "symbiosis" (for lack of better word) of human with AI seems to be an emergent value proposition of AI. In the process of doing stuff with AI, prod
11.
by genidoi 2mo ago
> However AI cannot meaningfully handle feedback and learn. Well this is the central bet of AI coding isn't it? We, the humans-in-the-loop, get better at knowing ahead of time which patterns AI will handle better than others, all th
12.
by genidoi 3mo ago
Right? The last month alone has felt like a full year of experience compressed into 30 days.
13.
by genidoi 6mo ago
> Starship at $170B is pure option value on technology still in advanced testing. The argument that Starship is somehow an experimental/unproven technology that might fail to materialise was absurd but plausible sounding before flig
14.
by genidoi 6mo ago
Oh it is yeah.
15.
by genidoi 6mo ago
> So I asked him. "What is your developer workflow using Copilot?" I was not prepared for the answer he gave me: I don’t know why I get annoyed when LLM’s and their output are casually referred to as “he/she”, particularly
16.
by genidoi 6mo ago
We're speculating here but between time correlation, browser fingerprinting and telemetry, the average user attempting to pull off a clean compartmentalisation of two accounts has no chance, even when they think they do.
17.
by genidoi 6mo ago
Makes you wonder if Google models how much revenue they lose specifically to this fear, because it's very real. I would simply never use GCP or Gemini because the idea of being banned from Google for absolutely any long-tail reason is
18.
by genidoi 6mo ago
There is realistically no way to evade the account correlation systems that Google (likely) has.
19.
by genidoi 6mo ago
That can be solved by filtering out any posts made after November 2022.
20.
by genidoi 6mo ago
Those are all arguments for why Ethereum is a bad cryptocurrency, not for why Ethereum isn’t a cryptocurrency at all.
21.
by genidoi 6mo ago
Especially given the LLM does not trust the user. An LLM can be jailbroken into lowering it's guardrails, but no amount of rapport building allows you to directly talk about material details of banned topics. Might as well never trust
22.
by genidoi 7mo ago
No vigilant insider is making a series of "single market predictions with high accuracy" on the same account. They would make unlinkable bets on fresh accounts.
23.
by genidoi 7mo ago
You can't be sure that they are an insider or lucky, just from onchain data.
24.
by genidoi 7mo ago
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.
25.
by genidoi 7mo ago
Right, you just pay daily in worrying when, not if, youtube will terminate your account and delete your "videos".
26.
by genidoi 8mo ago
Referring to engineers with top secret+ security clearances as "consultants" seems reductionistic.
27.
by genidoi 9mo ago
Atomic clock non-expert here, what does having a fleet of atomic clocks entail and why would the hyperscalers bother?
28.
by genidoi 9mo ago
I didn’t catch it either on the first pass but also felt something was off about the article, as if a human had sanitised most of the AI idiosyncrasies out. Now I have taken note to auto-distrust any “article” that lacks an author name, who
29.
by genidoi 9mo ago
Considering that you chose to not include your name or even a HN username in the byline of the article, there is an argument to be made that you are, in fact, hiding from it.
30.
by genidoi 9mo ago
Also three uses of a semi-colon for no reason. Nobody writes like this. > The log is the truth; the order book is just a real-time projection of this sequence. > The book is fast; the log is truth. > Matching engines can crash; the

More ›