genge

5 ms·

1.
by genge 3y ago
There are quite some papers on making BTC quantum resistent (and some already are). Here a good podcast on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-Y4PT8va94
2.
by genge 3y ago
The difference is that the US can back one by printing more money, and they can't print more bitcoin.
3.
by genge 3y ago
How exactly would it become un-ressellable. Agreed, you would have to remain in the black market, but you cannot censor a transaction.
4.
by genge 3y ago
It doesn't bypass the rule. It just creates an alternative american market for it. You can still buy bitcoin following the rules of bitcoin if you chose so.
5.
by genge 4y ago
The article doesn't provide someone that understands crypto when their focus is solely on the bad. Check one of the biggest projects, Polkadot and their Substrate framework. It's an amazing work just from a technical point of vi
6.
by genge 4y ago
There are legit projects. There are many bad projects. HN people generalize and the ones that know the legit projects understand discussing is a waste of time.
7.
by genge 4y ago
You just join IPFS with things like https://crust.network/ and that's 'sufficiently decentralized'. People confuse decentralized with sufficiently decentralized which is what most Dapps are focusing.
8.
by genge 4y ago
> This describes every place on Earth except -- arguably -- Venezuela and Somalia. That's just ignorance. Argentina, a G20 member, has had banks not allow it's citizens access their accounts in 2002. Currently they don't a
9.
by genge 4y ago
If it helps you understand, there's blockchains being built with close to none tokenomic concept to it. Meaning, there's no value on investing on their token but on using the platform. In some cases it's posible, in others it
10.
by genge 4y ago
OpenSea is a DAO, so if they: a) voted an NFT out: well, people against it would move to an other platform and still have access to their NFT. b) somoeone on the front-end deleted access to an NFT: they would probably move the front-end
11.
by genge 4y ago
I don't get this, it's a work being done by multiple teams.
12.
by genge 4y ago
I provided a link to a very thoughtful critique and pointed out how it's lazy. I commented on that, I wasn't expecting on having to give a lecture on the specifics. As for the quoted part on specific, for instance a blockchain
13.
by genge 4y ago
This article is realy lazy. If you want an actually valid argument against web3, here is Tim O'Reilly's take. He is the creator of the term web2.0 and created much of what we know as open source: https://www.oreilly.com
14.
by genge 5y ago
Measuring the current levels of interest and potential adoption rates of leading data lake table formats using commonly available metrics (github, slack, websites, content, communities)
15.
Iceberg, Delta and Hudi: Evaluating Current Interest and Rate of Adoption(garystafford.medium.com)
2 points by genge 5y ago|1 comments