gefhfff

10 ms·

1.
by gefhfff 5y ago
> Inviting a member of parliament just to talk about being a member of parliament Reading from your linked summary, I get the impression it's not just about being a member of the parliament
2.
by gefhfff 5y ago
I don't think making cities ad free in general isn't interesting to anyone who's not a German, let alone lives in that specific city
3.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Dude, I think you forget about the pandemic. There's no way any other event could be a in-person event right now.
4.
by gefhfff 5y ago
https://fahrplan.events.ccc.de/rc3/2021/Fahrplan/
5.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Please check out Matrix. You will get what you described without even needing a phone number and WITH E2EE
6.
Fossil fuel combustion kills more than 1M people every year, study says(arstechnica.com)
24 points by gefhfff 5y ago|5 comments
7.
by gefhfff 5y ago
FluffyChat has a multi account feature
8.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Ideas: (0) build on the Matrix protocol (and get 2) and 3) almost for free)
9.
by gefhfff 5y ago
No, I uninstalled it when Facebook acquired WhatsApp. I switched to Telegram, Wire and Threema. When Matrix became viable in 2020, I switched to it. Though, I still have a few contacts remaining at Telegram.
10.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Well, we can't do anything about it. It basically has already happened through prolonged inaction in the last decades. 1.5 degree is about to become unreachable. Nobody really cares.
11.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Perhaps. I am not sure if WASM is going to be it. It certainly could be
12.
by gefhfff 5y ago
I'd like to read about developing in the post JavaScript web
13.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Encryption does not imply authentication, does it?
14.
by gefhfff 5y ago
A recent example is "Message Layer Security". While Wire and Matrix are working on a decentralized version the IETF is, unfortunately, working towards one based on a central entity. Source: https://news.ycombinator.com&
15.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Matrix itself has as much as an UI as Email (even less)
16.
by gefhfff 5y ago
> is evidence of a strong reality distortion field How so?
17.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Why? ( I didn't care a bit about this aspect when I approached Rust )
18.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Gitkraken has an undo button :)
19.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Is it easy now?
20.
by gefhfff 5y ago
"small" 6 months can be a tipping point happening or not. Additionally, each produced ton of green house gases is contributing to climate change right now The more electricity to decarbonize the more difficult.
21.
by gefhfff 5y ago
You are making (wrong) assumptions: - electricity is the only part where Bitcoin produces emissions (emissions of mining hardware) - wasting climate neutral energy does not matter (it does: it's harder, takes more time and resources to
22.
Save Food Help the Planet(toogoodtogo.com)
1 points by gefhfff 5y ago|0 comments
23.
by gefhfff 5y ago
The study was repeatedly updated. Latest correction is from Gaya Herrington (2021).
24.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Regarding climate: Carbon intensive manufacturing stays Carbon intensive if automated. You only allow humans to do another thing. Not trying to be offensive. Having said that, I think you can make the greatest impact by trying to influence
25.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Please do it! Tbh, while I'd welcome it, I'd prefer rigorous Carbon pricing with dividends
26.
Save Food Help the Planet(toogoodtogo.com)
1 points by gefhfff 5y ago|0 comments
27.
by gefhfff 5y ago
So you have found things to be changed (back). Same goes for shops having centralized a lot especially in the US at it seems, while local shops are much more bicycle or even foot friendly. Generally, there is no silver bullet, but there are
28.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Should be doable, see recent supply chain law of Germany regarding human rights
29.
by gefhfff 5y ago
Another option: get work nearby. Some jobs will also get pay raises if there is demand for them, but people can't afford to take them. Working remote doesn't work just for IT, and I didn't claim everything works for everybod
30.
by gefhfff 5y ago
That taxation is redistributing wealth (supporting climate change). Reducing loopholes won't reduce carbon emissions. Internalizing the cost will, so I can't even imagine how this would be more beneficial. So, just do both

More ›