Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gdebel
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
Low Background Steel
(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points
by
gdebel
2y ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
by
gdebel
4y ago
Hi, ophthalmologist here :-) The good news is that if there is no underlying pathology (such as keratoconus, which should be sought in case of progressing astigmatism), every ametropia can be corrected with the right glasses and allow a goo
3.
▲
by
gdebel
4y ago
I had the opportunity to taste this berry where I live (French Polynesia) and indeed very surprised by its powerful sweetening effect. It looks like an under-exploited potential to me.
4.
▲
The 'Miracle' Berry That Could Replace Sugar (2014)
(theatlantic.com)
7 points
by
gdebel
4y ago
|
3 comments
5.
▲
by
gdebel
4y ago
I'm genuinely interested in your testimony. Did you, by any chance, underwent a refraction after cycloplegia (cyclopentolate) anytime in your life? Cyclopentolate suppresses the ciliary spasm and allows to measure the real, residual m
6.
▲
by
gdebel
4y ago
Yes, hyperopia is a very ungrateful condition... The usual situation is patients which had a perfect vision all their life, and, around 40, lose their near vision, and their far vision a few years later. This is always a little bit depressi
7.
▲
by
gdebel
4y ago
There is indeed much more evidence for this advice. This is my I do with my kids. Using your far vision a lot I childhood, with enough light exposure, could be a real preventive habit.
8.
▲
by
gdebel
4y ago
No you can't do that, because the patient must look at a target. There is an eye tracker in the laser but you have to look in the right direction. The surgery is much less impressive that you can imagine. Take an advice with a reputabl
9.
▲
by
gdebel
4y ago
The problem is that you can't measure axial length with an autorefractometer. You need a biometer. The autoref will tell you the objective refraction of the patient (which is quite imprecise). The eyeball gets longer with time in high
10.
▲
by
gdebel
4y ago
Ophthalmologist here. The myopia epidemic is real thing. The advice given in this post is not a dangerous thing to try. However, I doubt that the theory is true, and I doubt that following this method will really help myopic patients. Let&#
11.
▲
by
gdebel
5y ago
Well, by looking at all the answers, I obviously missed my point. Sorry for that :-) (I'm not a native english speaker as you noticed so it may also explain the misunderstanding ?) Of course this is not how I talk to my patients... I u
12.
▲
by
gdebel
5y ago
(Ophthalmologist): To any future HN reader scared by those intraocular injections: don't fear them. I'm on my way to the operating room and going to perform cataract surgery under topical (=eyedrops only) anesthesia, as I always d
13.
▲
by
gdebel
5y ago
Yes, of course. A simple Pubmed query will bring a lot of occurrences : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Keratoconus+eye+rubbin... For a complete argumentation and discussion about the case for the role of eye rubbing
14.
▲
by
gdebel
5y ago
This is infuriating. This is why I always comment when I see people talking about KC on HN (guess what? There is a lot. I won't do the research but I'm almost sure that this is the most frequent pathologie people here talk about.
15.
▲
by
gdebel
5y ago
Hi, I'm an ophthalmologist, corneal specialist (and regular HN reader). I just would like to draw your attention to the absolute necessity to avoid any eye rubbing. This point is very often ignored by some colleagues, for various reaso
16.
▲
by
gdebel
5y ago
Says "scientific fact" on the landing page. No scientific paper cited.
17.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
(empirical, non scientific opinion): usually, wearing contact lenses tends to prevent vigorous eye rubbing, during the day. Also, people with sensitive, itchy eyes tend to avoid contact lenses: this is a two-way relationship. Nefarious eye
18.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
If the outcomes are as great as they look, I think one could expect "mainstream adoption" (specialized centers and unfrequent indications) in 2-3 years ? This is a hard guess!
19.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
Sorry, I thought it was public. I updated my profile.
20.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
To start with, full disclosure : this is a controversial topic. The majority of eye surgeons are still convinced that there is a genetic predisposition to keratoconus, and that eye rubbing is an optional trigger. Other (a growing number) th
21.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
I sympathize. I don't know what kind of procedure you underwent. If the blurry vision comes form an irregular anterior corneal surface, scleral lenses can be a game-changer. Also, cellular therapy could be an option in a few years, y
22.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
Corneal surgeon here ! (Note : I never implanted a keratoprosthesis. This is an extremely unfrequent procedure, usually performed by a handful of surgeons in a given country). Some insights about this topic. This looks like a great device
23.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
Thank you, great work.
24.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
Haha, nope ! As a convenience procedure, and as such exposed to liability risks, and because of the extremely high cost of the lasers, you'll have to pay 2-3000 euros for both eyes (in France, at least). It is in fact cheaper in the US
25.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
Lasers revolutionized medicine, particularly in two specialties where the organ is accessible to light: dermatology and ophthalmology. We use : - excimer laser (UV) for their photoablative properties, to change to anterior corneal radius of
26.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
I agree on the very long term possibilities. However, the first problem to solve is the data collection. Saving doctors and nurses from their horrible professional softwares and replacing them with user-friendly, well-thought, data collecti
27.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
Honestly, I don't know what to think. Ophthalmology is a great field for AI researchers (lots of images: the eye is an organ that you can photograph and analyze visually in every angles, almost like in dermatology). In Ophthalmology, d
28.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
This is exacerbated by the fact that if the AI told the doctor that there is a doubt, no doctor will take the risk of not doing a biopsy / scanner / MRI / surgery (depending on the case). Because, how would you defend yoursel
29.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
Hi, I did not intend to be disrespectful, sorry if you read my message like this. I mainly intended to underline the fact that we (doctors) were promised a revolution in healthcare (AKA : to disappear) and we ended with diagnostic scores. H
30.
▲
by
gdebel
6y ago
I assumed that basic ML was similar to the statistics I already knew, and that deep learning was inherently different. It had to be different, given how people talked about it. It is just an illustration of how the fuss made about AI at thi
More ›