garfield_light

5 ms·

1.
by garfield_light 1y ago
[flagged]
2.
by garfield_light 1y ago
Yeah we knew that, that's the point.
3.
by garfield_light 1y ago
> Nobody is asking for compelled speech here. It's implicit, you just don't want to see it. It's literally political commissars. > And yes, after being forced to start business meetings with a brief mention of whether a
4.
by garfield_light 1y ago
You have the delusion that true value is the same as a fungible one dimensional number, that externalities (negative or positive) don't exist, we have perfect information and local minima aren't real. The original example is that
5.
by garfield_light 1y ago
I imagine you would sign a different tune if Biden admin hypothetically forced your employer via federal funding to make you say "Trans Rights!", for plurality of thought of course.
6.
by garfield_light 1y ago
So a top TikTok influencer is more valuable than a surgeon?
7.
by garfield_light 1y ago
Sure, a Marxist might think IP is absurd on ideological grounds, but a Social Democrat? Maybe? A socially conscious neoliberal? They love IP. Someone may also hate Mickey Mouse's copyright extension and at the same time hate GenAI! Thi
8.
by garfield_light 1y ago
Copyright as a concept is prescriptive not descriptive. It doesn't appear from an observation of the laws of reality, it's law to produce certain outcomes, so what copyright applies to is a question of what will the legislative bo
9.
by garfield_light 1y ago
JUNAEB in Chile is pretty much SNAP for college students. Originally you could buy beer or pretty much anything in the supermarket, it got limited strictly to food and then items with two or less warning labels [0]. A big difference is inte
10.
by garfield_light 1y ago
>He should have accepted their offer of 10% as a bug bounty. If I was in his shoes I wouldn't trust them. They can just try to put me on jail anyways.
11.
by garfield_light 1y ago
Irrelevant, his thoughts in the matter or him being a shithead don't make the unintended use of a smart contract illegal or not. This is just usual case of Wilhoit’s Law by shitcoin peddlers. > There must be in-groups whom the law p
12.
by garfield_light 1y ago
Why? He seems better than the average foodtuber.
13.
by garfield_light 1y ago
"Don't touch our oligarch." If the US withdraws from NATO for this, Article 5 was never gonna be respected.
14.
by garfield_light 1y ago
It's ccTLDs directly or the country abbreviations from ISO 3166-1. They tariff'd Norfolk Island but not Easter Island, so it must be that.
15.
by garfield_light 1y ago
> It also has a separate country abbreviation (RE). You know, like you'd see on an address. The thing that tells you where something, like a good imported in to the United States, is coming from. Yes, obviously, it's ISO 3166-1
16.
by garfield_light 1y ago
It explains why they singled out Reunion from France, it has a separate ccTLD. That type of mistake is the kind a LLM would do, not a human... I'm convinced. this is fucking crazy.
17.
by garfield_light 1y ago
It's technically still "smart" in the sense that it can be connected to the internet, but the samsung digital signage TVs don't have weird shit or ads.
18.
by garfield_light 1y ago
> [...] unless lesions show up differently in different demographics. Well, first the model looks at the entire X-ray and lesions probably do show differently. Maybe it's genetic/sex-based or it's due how lesions develop d
19.
by garfield_light 1y ago
>I marvel at it alright! But obviously not for the same reasons you do. I think it's incredibly stupid, and likely driven by nutters in the Green party who are ideological (and fucking wrong) instead of pragmatic and science based.
20.
by garfield_light 1y ago
Nitpick, but the image in "Innerscene Health Impacts" is very obviously AI generated, besides any personal opinions on GenAI it just looks bad. I suspect photographing the intern will yield something better.
21.
by garfield_light 1y ago
Not related to the post, but you don't believe in physiotherapy? You know, the "help grandma to go from wheelchair to a walker after a fall thorough controlled exercise" people. You don't mean chiropractors, right? Terms
22.
by garfield_light 1y ago
Ehhh, I meant there's a non zero chance you guys aren't getting free elections, with plausible deniability of course. He tried before, maybe Trump achieves it this time.
23.
by garfield_light 1y ago
Replace mobile with television and this sounds quaint. Some people always find a excuse to be dehumanizing even if the "excuse" is a real problem.
24.
by garfield_light 1y ago
>Don't yuck someone's yum, if they're making decisions for themselves with open eyes. Why? You cannot critique the decisions of anyone? They are free to ignore me, or think I'm wrong. In respect to you points, an engi
25.
by garfield_light 1y ago
The real test will be the midterms.
26.
by garfield_light 1y ago
This is the type of thing that can get you on jail or even (quietly) killed during a normal US administration. I'm not surprised Goldberg GTFO intermediately.
27.
by garfield_light 1y ago
I'm a nobody, but I imagine the feds or spooks would never use anything like that on someone they have physical access on. If the target is in their jurisdiction or a blacksite and it's that important, a lead pipe is easier. IF
28.
by garfield_light 1y ago
Fair point, I'll be more careful.
29.
by garfield_light 1y ago
> This could be marketing to try to replace NextDoor. This is kinda funny from my perspective. In most of the world WhatsApp reigns supreme to such a degree, that advertising for it would have the same pointlessness of a Coca Cola ad. In