garba_dlm

8 ms·

1.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h58uT_BGV4
2.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
yes, that's what they're doing. because they hate North Koreans, because it's part of their government. how this works is described in "1984" (by Orwell), which is a fictional work.... ahahahhaah
3.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
still racist, it's the worst kind of racism, brother Vs brother (or possibly more accurate cousins? dunno) for long term effects of this practice see the Gaza v. Israel fiasco
4.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
publishing is no longer a business model. the only 'business' left for people in that 'industry' is to charge rent which is taxes
5.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
sure, ok... but in some places it functions as a public utility further, there was a principle of roman law that forbids this... then again the USA is not following those principles (civil law) but common law which means you can disregard w
6.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
the internet is a global network, but I suppose the telegraphs really is that old
7.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
except our bodies already kinda do that on their own how would killing species of gut biota would helpful? helpful for whom to accomplish what?? we're headed to a future in which you have to take special pills so that the food doesn&#x
8.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
> Blockchain tech isn't 14 years old, it's 30 years old, or even 40 if you want to go back to the '82 paper. Still no world-changing tech has come from it, aside from monopoly money. that's like saying that submarin
9.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
ahaha, downvoted out of sight but I'm pretty sure I read this sentiment in some other comment in this site
10.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
safety first. at the expense of other's life's; but safety first
11.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
so your take is that it's saying to increase pressure, exploit harder, and get more even more faster?
12.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
"this idea is mine, I cannot let you have this idea" the idea fits in a digital format. they're literally building scarcity for the future, right now.
13.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
and Golang is a clever way to build up an AI
14.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
my point is they're related. but i didn't explain why and you're mistaken on the intent of gaslighting. it's intended to control 'confabulation' reflects on how that's sort of control is even possible
15.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
cool, the scientific name for studying gaslighting!
16.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
agree. the USD dollar is backed by the threat of violence which is how I understand what it means to be an empire; in contrast with a 'civilization' (though it seems as though empire is the early stage of civilization, it boots th
17.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
> Inertia is not a virtue - neither for an object, nor for a human because inertia is unavoidable. a fact of nature, it's useless to try to judge it as good or bad; however we all do this. and after trying to do this, we all eventua
18.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
> USD is backed by literally nothing. LITERALLY NOTHING. that is not quite right. historically USD has been backed by the USA military
19.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
that can't be correct. bitcoin has too much value.
20.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
but it also means that Apple is the new Goldman similarly to google turning into "internet microsoft" and microsoft turned into ibm.....
21.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
I think that human memory "keeps" the next prompt by baking it into the parameters of the "neural net" (the brain) immediately this is has gotta be somehow an analogue of dreams andor sleep andor AI hallucinations. I thi
22.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
it's not a prompt, it's a dialog, it's many prompts.
23.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
> What is the suspected reason? fraud I'm still looking for ways to answer my own followup question how does it make sense that this is the suspected reason? (who is defrauding who? why and how?)
24.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
"due process"??? but we've gotta update this now that the law will turn to software
25.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
my suggestion is don't monetize you already did it which in a way means it's already paid for. just donate it. open source it? set it free but it's your choice to make.
26.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
so essentially: "because you only have worse choices"
27.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
> You are being silly about "the law!!!", right? I really do believe this. software will eventually change the very nature of human language and hence of human thought I picked up this line of thought from an academic Walter
28.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
> little reason to expect it. there's one huge reason to expect this: it's cheaper than real people (no salary, no royalties) only looks expensive because it's new. but it won't stay expensive because it's all
29.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
but you are missing out that the solution is to keep making it inconvenient to let people use linux and other kinds of custom devices eventually either nobody will use that, or they'll just jump the shark and outlaw such things I know
30.
by garba_dlm 3y ago
the solution, regrettably, already in motion, is (obviously) to make sure less people know anything about computers. by these two actions combined this anti-freedom garbage (further consolidating and centralizing powers) will work effective

More ›