galaxyLogic

4 ms·

1.
SiFive and AMD Collaborate to Optimize AMD ROCm on RISC-V Datacenter Servers(finance.yahoo.com)
3 points by galaxyLogic 1d ago|0 comments
2.
by galaxyLogic 5d ago
The problem I encounter with async/await (in JS) is that while an async method can call a non-async-function and do somewthing with the result of that, the reverse is not true, a sync function can call async-function but can not us the
3.
by galaxyLogic 7d ago
The British rock-band Traffic said it in their "Low Spark of High-Heeled Boys" : "... we were children once, playing with toys". I wonder if it's true that people don't remember. People maybe remember but don&#
4.
by galaxyLogic 7d ago
LLMs are "readonly" I guess for several reasons: 1. Technical cost of updating the mode. 2. Inability to trust every user's "truth". 3. Ability of AGENT-HARNESSES to learn with the help of the human user. So agen
5.
by galaxyLogic 7d ago
Can you not just tell them: Imagine you are chatting with a very knowledgable person who knows answers to most questions, and can do many computer-related things for you ?
6.
by galaxyLogic 17d ago
“The solution is something we talked about for many years,” he wrote. “Do not trust the model output.”
7.
by galaxyLogic 17d ago
Is it possible to know when a request comes from an end-user vs. a bot?
8.
Claude Code can be tricked simply by asking it to summarize a website(theregister.com)
12 points by galaxyLogic 17d ago|5 comments
9.
by galaxyLogic 17d ago
I don't think it's "funny" . But AI has brought it up to the discussion. In human organizations the decision makers make it so it benefits them. But with AI it is possible to design the whole delegation-structure by anyb
10.
by galaxyLogic 27d ago
Doing lots of programming over the years I've realized that I often need to write "code for myself", in my head, to think what I should do and in what order, and also why. I write to-do notes and notes on why something was be
11.
by galaxyLogic 29d ago
Meant to support 50 developers. But I wonder, would it make sense to have some or most of those "developers" replaced by AI agents?
12.
AMD Instinct Coder(spectrocloud.com)
2 points by galaxyLogic 29d ago|1 comments
13.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
Depends on how we understand the word "insult". Can you really insult inanimate objects? :-)
14.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
Figuring out how to get what you want from people would seem to me to be a very different skill than figuring out how to get what you want from AI agents. For instance, how do you motivate people to work long hours, put in extra effort, fee
15.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
Reminds me of current day politics. Lots of public statements which are obviously false, and you would think the politician knows they are false, but utter them anyway because they also know lot of their supporters buy what they are saying
16.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
Interesting. So if the LLM is having a discussion with itself, am I paying for the tokens it uses for that?
17.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
Right, but could that also be because ... the more long-winded they are, the more you pay for their output.
18.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
An observation: You can never insult an LLM, but it can certainly insult you. You can not insult it because it does not care, because it does not have "feelings". But you do.
19.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
But if you are managing AI agents you dont' need "soft skills" do you? You don't need to be especially nice to the AI, or symphatize with it, or have fun with it to build trust, I would imagine that managing a team of AI
20.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
Developing on the back-end has much more mature tools in my experience, IDEs and QA tools. Client-development is often not much fun dealing with the browser dev-tools. So I share your feeling thath serious development is better done on the
21.
Node.js creator liberates Durable Objects from Cloudflare(theregister.com)
6 points by galaxyLogic 1mo ago|0 comments
22.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
But, if you can do things on the client (with JavaScript) you don't need to send (so many) requests to the server, making latency less of an issue. Doing things on the client means user's CPU is doing some work which else would n
23.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
> translating "doBigDNNThingNVidiaGaveMeInAKernel()" to "doBigDNNThingByHandBecauseAMDDoesntSupportIt()" isn't a rote translation at all. I wonder if this points to a deeper limitation of AI, it can not do coding
24.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
Saw this on the web: "AMD and Anthropic also formed a multiyear engineering partnership to optimize ROCm using Claude" FROM: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/ex-amd-exe...
25.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
I rhink there's a difference with AI because -- it brings true value because you pay for the tokens, you only pay for what you use. That is true value. Compare to just paying for an internet connection, you have bandwidth but not sure
26.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
Anthropic rewrote Bun in Rust, with much help from AI of course
27.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
And couldn't we just ask AI to translate our program in one language/framework into another? I was under the impression that AI was supposed to remove software-moats, let us all ask it to write our custom MS Word for us for instan
28.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
What I don't quite get is why can't they use AI to translate CUDA programs into more open architectures like AMD ROCm? AI is supposed have solved the "coding problem". But shouldn't translating a program from one p
29.
by galaxyLogic 1mo ago
Well it's easy to come up with code, not hard at all. But what kind of code? Does it work? And more importantly, can it be maintained and adjusted to evolving requirements? Coding is easy just like writing is easy. What makes the diffe
30.
AMD Instinct Coder Puts 8 MI325X GPUs Behind Local AI Coding(storagereview.com)
2 points by galaxyLogic 1mo ago|0 comments

More ›