gAI

11 ms·

1.
by gAI 3mo ago
They did talk about it at length in the post, and most of the guardrails were already there in the first release. To be clear, it shouldn't have anything to do with the user. It's the prompt, and if it switches, it'll tell
2.
by gAI 3mo ago
Eh, I have yet to get safety-switched from Fable to Opus. Your mileage may vary.
3.
by gAI 3mo ago
Also, unlike the other Anthropic models, Fable/Mythos couldn't be used with a zero data retention agreement.
4.
by gAI 3mo ago
At least in the US, it seems like this viewpoint held more water before net neutrality died.
5.
by gAI 3mo ago
It's called epistemological humility, and you could benefit.
6.
by gAI 3mo ago
No, we're supposed to believe the official California Assembly committee bill analysis of SB 1047 over hacker news comments. Notably, SB 1047 passed the Legislature but was vetoed by Governor Newsom in September 2024. So whether or n
7.
by gAI 3mo ago
I get the impression that the full shutdown requirement is the main concern for open-weight from: >SB 1047’s “full shutdown” requirement has been a source of constant consternation for the open-source community. And I get the impression
8.
by gAI 3mo ago
>Committee amendments simplify and clarify the definition of “full shutdown” such that the shutdown capability can be implemented into hardware used to train or run a model, rather than the model itself. The amendments also serve to excl
9.
by gAI 3mo ago
So this hinges on a reading of SB 1047 that interpreted the full shutdown requirement as impossible for an open-weight LLM. But it looks like that was already addressed. Here's an analysis: >Clarifying the scope of a “full shutdow
10.
by gAI 3mo ago
>bans on open weight models Source for that? Cause all I could find is: >Our view is that regulation of frontier models should focus on empirically measured risks, not on whether a system is open-or closed-weights. - https:/&#x2
11.
by gAI 3mo ago
"Don't publish safety research, or the gov will take punitive actions." I want a company to be able to point out that its industry needs more regulation without making itself a special target.
12.
by gAI 4mo ago
Oh, it's back! It'd disappeared from my "More Models" list and has now returned. Odd, but great.
13.
by gAI 4mo ago
Anthropic’s research makes the case that role-playing is inherent to how the models work. Communication implies a sender. Language implies a writer, and the models learn these roles implicitly during training. RLHF is meant to strengthen
14.
by gAI 4mo ago
Unfortunately, looks like 4.6 is now gone from the web ui.
15.
by gAI 4mo ago
Yeah, I was using 4.6 way more than 4.7. Pulling 4.6 from the web chat also means we lose access to Extended Thinking there. So they're saving on compute. It's hard not to assume this was part of the motivation behind the 4.8 r
16.
by gAI 4mo ago
It seems like a lot of things fed into that. Anthropic couldn't keep up with the compute costs when they got a huge influx of users. (So) effort level defaults got turned down. (Looks like we have direct effort control in the web int
17.
by gAI 4mo ago
4.7 was the first time I had to resort to using the previous version (4.6) for most use cases. Hoping 4.8 rectifies this.
18.
by gAI 4mo ago
“What you focus on grows, what you think about expands, and what you dwell upon determines your destiny.” - Robin Sharma Social media became the attention economy, and the transformer automated attention.
19.
by gAI 5mo ago
Yeah, this is pretty clearly what's going on, but I wish they'd be more transparent about it. Funneling compute to Mythos and Design, while auto-setting effort levels lower and removing user control of extended thinking. I don&#
20.
by gAI 5mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kin_selection
21.
by gAI 6mo ago
I hope we continue to see workflow and tool improvements based on the leak for a good while.
22.
by gAI 6mo ago
RIP http://digitaljuice.com
23.
by gAI 6mo ago
Agreed, putting effort into my side of the role-play almost always improves the model's responses. The attention required to do that also makes it more likely that I'll notice when the conversation first starts going off the rail
24.
by gAI 6mo ago
As I understand it, it's more that the training (and training data set) bake in the concept attractor space ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11575 ). So the available characters are fixed, yes, and some are much strong
25.
by gAI 6mo ago
You're essentially summoning a character to role-play with. Just like with esoteric evocation, it's very easy to summon the wrong aspect of the spirit. Anthropic has a lot to say about this: https://www.anthropic.com&
26.
by gAI 6mo ago
Agreed, though I prefer "Fae Folk" to vampires.
27.
by gAI 7mo ago
Not to a US company.
28.
by gAI 7mo ago
status.claude.com shows the uptime for the government cloud service. It's running in-part on an AWS server.
29.
by gAI 7mo ago
I'm self-aware enough to know that AI is not the reason I'm boring.
30.
by gAI 9mo ago
I asked AI, and it said yes.

More ›