g15jv2dp

6 ms·

1.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
> At Caltech, there has been an average gap of 10 percentage points between the acceptance rate for male and female applicants since 2003-04. Women were accepted at more than double the rate for men for the 2022-23 school year. This is a
2.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
> They also didn't say men would even ask anyone out, are you being sexist, and assuming men always ask, and women do not? Not remotely related to what I said. > Or are you suggesting women don't have a sex drive, and should
3.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
> I can guarantee you that way more men applied to Caltech than women did. You cannot guarantee that. Show some data or don't say anything. > That means the most talented and impressive young man who applied and didn’t get in is
4.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
Women don't go to university to enter your personal dating pool.
5.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
Which is bad.
6.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
Durov chose to become a French citizen. What do you make of that?
7.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
> This seems to be missing the elephant in the room - elisp doesn't suck, it is just a lisp. The article lists a few defaults of elisp that aren't shared by all lisps. What do you mean by this sentence?
8.
Pierre Cartier Passed Away(lemonde.fr)
3 points by g15jv2dp 2y ago|1 comments
9.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
This already exists, right now...? I've seen tons of USB hubs with an hdmi output and several USB ports that can be used concurrently. Hell I'm using one right now. Are you asking about something else?
10.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
> One thing you'll learn about my courtroom is that I'm not a toy. I am not to be played with. What a narcissistic piece of shit. Not everything is about you...
11.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
Ctrl+Z
12.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
> I think in practice, people write "Emphasize words like this.", then <left> , then <C-left><C-left> . At least I myself usually add markup immediately after writing the words to be marked up. Is this very
13.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
WTF. I'm interested in what you've created and want to understand the reason for your design decisions, and this is how you reply? edit: Well, it seems that the parent comment has been edited. But honestly, after reading the initi
14.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
There's no reason it wouldn't "work", the question is "why". Having such precise dates obviously comes with some compromises (e.g., the representation is larger, or it's variable depending on the value whi
15.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
The people who did the work obviously think it's fine, otherwise they wouldn't have licensed it under such a permissive licence.
16.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
Sorry but what does "arms length" mean? My software doesn't have arms. Using metaphors full of imagery is cute but essentially meaningless. > Two programs communicating over a socket aren't incorporated. They're
17.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
It's a sphere, the height is equal to the diameter that you plainly see on the picture.
18.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
There's a difference between "talking about it" and "the word is uttered somehow at some point".
19.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
I responded to a sibling comment with an explanation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41234913 But good on you for the condescension even though you didn't understand my point ;)
20.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
The mere mention of the word "testicle" makes you think that your coworkers want to have sex with you? Wow.
21.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
Schoolyard insult? Uh? Can you quote the part of my comment that would be the "schoolyard insult"? > This comment is in a discussion about an article titled, Tensors, the geometric tool that solved Einstein's relativity pr
22.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
Are you even trying to understand my point? Yes, in that direction, explicitly constructing an element of the bidual of V from an element of V is easy. To explicitly find an element of V from the element of the bidual, you need to choose a
23.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
I'm talking about a practical task. Not an abstract existence result.
24.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
You're offended if someone wrote "testicle" in source code? Are you also offended about "ankle" or "hair"? The puritanism...
25.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
There are no manifolds at all in this discussion... What are you even talking about? Just stringing words you vaguely know together??
26.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
You have a typo in your first line, and I answered a sibling comment about that. Metrics are irrelevant to the discussion (and I presume you wanted to write "norm" instead of "metric").
27.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
GP is giving you an element of V**. You want to turn it into a vector. To do that, please make the inverse isomorphism explicit without using a basis. I'll wait...
28.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
That's incorrect if V is infinite-dimensional. A (0,1)-tensor is just supposed to be an element of V but with your definition you get an element of the bidual of V. Which is not isomorphic to V when dim V is infinite. And even when dim
29.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
Phones usually have a web browser installed.
30.
by g15jv2dp 2y ago
If you can't pay money to content makers, what's the point of a patreon app? It's the whole purpose.

More ›