fxd

6 ms·

1.
by fxd 12d ago
At this point you were given a working demo https://youtube.com/watch?v=JZGjcLdfHPs and a link to source models where they were made https://www.meshy.ai/tags/lowpoly You can click them to see the wire
2.
by fxd 12d ago
No it isn’t. Nobody said you had to equate “intelligence” with “value of work” and you got it wrong: I said it’s impossible to define that value, not intelligence. I’ve seen a dozen or so useful definitions of intelligence.
3.
by fxd 13d ago
So vague it’s useless. We cannot in a declarative sense define what is economically valuable work even now let alone into the future. People take what they can get for pay. Very few individuals can demand a wage. The value of employment is
4.
by fxd 13d ago
Right, you are interested in “AGI” and presuming none of that requires consciousness right? For example, how do you know that “feeling pain” is not a functional prerequisite for a task. And that consciousness is a prerequisite for feeling p
5.
by fxd 13d ago
So basically, being able to set it free on some long running goal and it sort of “lives” and autonomously does its own tasks? I wonder at what point consciousness is necessary… that is, if you can have anything like that without it. To the
6.
by fxd 13d ago
“AGI” never made sense to me. It’s a purely marketing term right? I’ve ignored it thinking it would go away, but it keeps coming up. I get that consciousness differs from intelligence and that our waking awareness of life is a complete my
7.
by fxd 13d ago
One way to have the biggest house on the block is make sure nobody else can build. Why spend the money to build the bigger house when you don’t really enjoy it anyway - when your only motivation is that nobody else’s house is as big.
8.
by fxd 13d ago
In other words, the Flat Birth Theory. We can call them flat birthers
9.
by fxd 13d ago
At my job interviews are essentially rejection practice. The debriefings are these cringe sessions where everyone pretends to be better than the candidate, makes fun of them for being old, for their attire, for how they talk, it’s so so bad
10.
by fxd 13d ago
Why would a regular React site be so huge? Maybe they had bundled fonts and images. The bundle is just the lib plus your files minified. You want to bundle vs hitting dozens of requests just to get files. It’s not like React/webpack is
11.
by fxd 13d ago
They’ve gotten better. ~2 years ago the assets all had millions of polys and you couldn’t use them with raycasting or even loading the model without crashing the tab. Tripo, Meshy, etc all have “smart low poly” now as a paid feature. It wor
12.
by fxd 14d ago
It’s like those diet commercials from the 90s: “I simply eat more and the weight just falls off!” Showing pictures of chocolate cake and burgers. You’re gonna eat more: Milkshakes, pasta, French fries! You’re gonna lose more weight. And you