fuzz4lyfe

5 ms·

1.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
If this is so inexpensive why not agree to pay producers the costs incurred for not engaging in the practice plus a small fee if they don't engage in deforestation? They would be stupid to turn down free money and given so many people
2.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
c02 emissions per captia (metric tons): France 4.57 United Kingdom 6.50 Germany 8.89 USA 16.49 Brazil 2.59 https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?view=map >making environmentally sound decisions myself&
3.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
Fair enough. I didn't look up Brazil specially but I am familiar with the rates in the region and assumed they were similar. Western countries have not eliminated a quarter of their GDP to prevent climate change, shouldn't they do
4.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
Easily said from your position. Are you willing to give up most of your luxury to make that happen globally? If so, why haven't you yet?
5.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
My bad, I'll blame autocorrect
6.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
Has Brazil fully industrialized? With a per capita GDP of less than ten thousand dollars and a population mostly employed in the agriculture sector (compared to 2% in the US) I'd say not yet. The west is trying to kick the ladder out f
7.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
A lot of hackers I read about have a great deal of bravo about things like this. Yeah sure you found a vulnerability in a companies API and got something for free. What I look forward to see is his next hack, where he somehow gets past the
8.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
I don't live in Texas in 2012, so that isn't part of my parties platform. I suppose you agree with every element of every state democrat platform ever published. Well post Jim Crow of course.
9.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
>The Democrat you're referring to never owned any Uranium to sell. Yet millions flowed to her foundation upon the completion of that sale[0], getting paid for something you don't own is worse. https://www.nytimes.com
10.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
That article is from 2012 and is about the Texas GOP. It seems like this claim was not true.
11.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
I apologize, that was not my intent. I withdraw my comment.
12.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
Ever notice how management always think estimates have tons of wiggle room as if you are screwing around half the day? That's because that is their experience in the workplace.
13.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
Rapidly moving lead will kill you faster than asbestos, there might be a few tactical uses for such a garment.
14.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
The price you advertise is the price it sells for, otherwise you have committed fraud. Seems clear to me.
15.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
Your source continues... EPA estimates that the generation of clothing and footwear was 11.9 million tons in 2015 (4.5 percent of total MSW) If 4.5% in the majority, they have too many categories.
16.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
A Democrat who sold uranium to Russians and whose husband is a womanizer and of a very good friend of Epistein no less.
17.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
That seems a little post hoc and doesn't mention teaching creationism in public schools. I get there are things in there that people disagree with but I was looking for the point made previously. Simply citing a large document and not
18.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
Care to quote the passage? Its 60 some odd pages long.
19.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
What party platform document are you referencing? I've never seen that.
20.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
Your view of modern republicans is outdated. Many Republicans are non-religious like myself and align themselves closer to the views of the founding fathers. We simply see the rampant corruption in government and propose it is a better sol
21.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
So you desire that conservatives be victimized while proclaiming that they have no reason to feel like victims? Does your intent to victimize them not count?
22.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
You only do that if you care more about helping children than you care about clicks.
23.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
How can someone be a verb? I'm a eating. Doesn't make sense.
24.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
I like when people communicate in that manner. It let's me know I can safely tune out as the content will be devoid of information.
25.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
I agree with these "new rules" but isn't it odd how unelected DOJ officials get to effectively make new law out of whole cloth like this? I don't recall seeing anything in the constitution about the law making powers of
26.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
You forgot to mention that white nationalists are to blame.
27.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
Just an FYI. Every company talks about the great culture, work life balance, competitive pay and excellent benefits they offer. Jobseekers have to assume you are lying about those things, because most of your colleagues are. (this is why I
28.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
Have you ever considered that classifying people who disagree with you as a race of subhuman monsters is "amplifying the negativity you find in this world"? If a bored fourteen year old really offers a rhetorical threat to your ar
29.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
"I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Vouch to the Death Your Right to Say It"
30.
by fuzz4lyfe 7y ago
A large portion of unmarried men on are disability/work off the books I'd wager.

More ›