fullofideas

6 ms·

1.
by fullofideas 7mo ago
Honest question. Were these super specialized roles with such specific skill requirements that it took such a long time to find the right person? Looking back, do you think the team would have been better off hiring someone who came close e
2.
by fullofideas 9mo ago
While I agree with the sentiment, it is not true that only EU takes a “nationalistic” stance and safeguards its interests. US is famously doing it with tariffs..to bring back manufacturing, and I also remember hearing “America first”. Doesn
3.
by fullofideas 10mo ago
>Combine it with China's nuclear base and labor pool. And the cherry on top, America will train 600k Chinese students as Trump agreed to. I dont understand this part. What has nuclear base got to do with chip manufacturing? And sure
4.
by fullofideas 10mo ago
Agree. Any reasonable team should have code reviews in place, but an irresponsible coder would push the responsibility of code quality and correctness to code reviewers. They were doing it earlier too, but the scale and scope was much small
5.
by fullofideas 10mo ago
> The truth is that irresponsibles developers will produce irresponsible code, with or without LLMs True. But the difference is the scale and ease of doing with code generators. With a few clicks you can add hundreds of lines of code whi
6.
by fullofideas 10mo ago
Closely followed by “This should be an easy lift”
7.
by fullofideas 11mo ago
This is pushing the burden of proof on the society. Basically, asking everyone else to pitch in and improve sources so that ai companies can reference these trust worthy sources.
8.
by fullofideas 1y ago
This. There is a huge opportunity cost, even more so for the “best and brightest” (by whatever definition). The odds of striking it rich are really not in your favor. You may be better off working at big tech for a few years, save up, let t
9.
by fullofideas 1y ago
Not sure about the timespan that you are referring to. Post covid hiring high, in the last 2 years or so, the hiring bar has been extremely high, in general. Not denying your experiences, may be it is even higher for you. Personally, my exp
10.
by fullofideas 1y ago
I believe GDPR explicitly prevents such behavior.
11.
by fullofideas 2y ago
Fair enough that you did not say all Indians. But, your statement was broad enough to say nepotism is widespread among Indians in tech. And the article you linked was about fraud which doesn’t imply widespread nepotism in tech. I am not ask
12.
by fullofideas 2y ago
The linked article is about a fraud conducted by a few bad apples. I can see people colluding with others that are similar to them for criminal activities - gangs, drug smuggling, and probably other frauds too. I am not sure how you inferre
13.
by fullofideas 2y ago
I am not discounting what you said about wealth concentration and upward mobility, but the top post that started this thread is surely a counter example for what you are saying? Yes, the makers of openai/gemini/whatever could powe
14.
by fullofideas 3y ago
Like I say to my toddler, there is no need for rudeness to make a point. Nowhere did the poster say that is “sufficient” reason to ban ai. They were clarifying how software is different from humans and only that. You need to go up a couple
15.
Ron DeSantis Campaign Makes Trump Attack Ad with AI Imagery(petapixel.com)
3 points by fullofideas 3y ago|2 comments
16.
Ask HN: What made you join that startup?
2 points by fullofideas 5y ago|0 comments
17.
Ask HN: How would you assess a startup offer?
3 points by fullofideas 5y ago|0 comments