frklem

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by frklem 1y ago

   True, for each of the points discussed, there is an explicit mention on why it is desirable. But those are technical solutions, to technical problems. There is nothing wrong with that. The issue is, that the whole article is about technical
2. 2.▲
   by frklem 1y ago

   "Faced with such a marked defensive negative attitude on the part of a biased culture, men who have knowledge of technical objects and appreciate their significance try to justify their judgment by giving to the technical object the on
3. 3.▲
   by frklem 2y ago

   I know it is an article, and not a scientific publication, but that does not change the fact that the article is not serious at all regarding the ongoing discussion on AI. If this gets published in Nature, even as an opinion article, is bec
4. 4.▲
   by frklem 2y ago

   I can't believe this article is being published in Nature. The article is flawed, plagued with assumptions that I guess the author doesn't even notice (like what do we really mean by AGI, the epistemological problems/assumpti